Take the very best version of Wlad, whichever one you think whether it's the one who destroyed Mercer, the one who destroyed Byrd, the one who destroyed Chagaev or the one who destroyed Pulev. Totally your choice. As a gauntlet of fights pit him against the following at their absolute peak: Jack Dempsey Jack Johnson Max Schmelling Max Baer Joe Walcott Sonny Liston Rocky Marciano Joe Frazier George Foreman Ken Norton Ron Lyle Jimmy Young Michael Spinks Tim Witherspoon Mike Weaver Andrew Golota There is one caveat, clinching is punishable in excess. So say 4 clinches allowed, after that it's warning and then ultimately a DQ. I don't for one second doubt Wlad is a great. But I am beginning to question whether he was a great boxer, whether his skills are the skills of a great. So let's remove he one bit of controversy surrounding his title run, let's say he cannot clinch everyone someone comes near. With that caveat in place how do you see him faring over all and vs each individual. Wlad was extremely consistent so these can be over a period of 10 years or so. Discuss.
I can't really abide by the clinching rule, though, it makes it too speculative. It's also unfair, Ali demonstrably clinched more than Wlad did, never really understood how Ali gets a pass for it and Wlad doesn't. We can't know how Ali would have done without clinching.
Yes we can, without clinching Ali lost to Frazier, with clinching he won. Now all you answers are void. Please review your answers with the no clinching rule. Thank you.
KO1 Spinks? Spinks could have survived for a decision, especially against the more tentative post-2004 Wlad. Think it would have looked quite like Byrd 1. Don't think Wlad would crowd Spinks and go for the KO like Tyson did.
No clinching I'd only take Foreman and maybe Spoon to beat Wlad. Foreman would have been a nightmare with his relentless aggression. Liston would be too slow of foot IMO, young Wlad coud outbox him. Everyone else is simply overmatched.
Good point, I didn't think that fully through, Spinks probably gets underestimated a bit because of the Tyson debacle. Spinks might have lasted to a decision, I suspect he'd get ko'd along the way though.