Wlad's Excuses For His Ko Loss To Brewster

Lmao a classic

 

love it

 

Goddamn, now I'm all fuzzy and I can't be mean anymore.

I better check back in when I've hammered my finger again.

 

rubbish theres no reason to stop being mean to yourself like u r.

 

Is this guy for real

Exactly when did I say that? Post?

 

That I've asked 6 times & you still haven't produced a reply is actually more telling than the answer itself.

 

That could possibly be because you only posted it two pages back! LOL

Yes this. You cited this quote:

Replying "this"..

WK & JC remember them? Your MO is to discredit there opposition & dumb down there wins. Would you like me to dig up some of them?

 

Meh, I am unswayed.

Wlad fought some shitty competition and didn't look great doing it. He's very limited technically, has no wins worth a **** historically, multiple losses any HW champion from any era should be embarrassed to carry, and even in winning Mr. Klitschko found a way to hit a record low in the sport twice over with his global appeal and having the huggiest HW title fight of all time including when throws were legal.

Dude just couldn't box very well. Semantics like a ratio don't change that. He got beaten slowly and easily by a fat man making funny faces at him because he can't pivot. You can say it's because he's too old but then your ass has to point out when track fighting Wlad could pivot....which you can't because he never learned to.

He used basic **** to beat a slew of men who are not even competent at the fundamentals let alone physically capable of doing twelve or being a full size HW.

How many fights did Wlad take where he wasn't the favorite? Still managed getting KTFO and embarrassed by a fatmen.

How many volunteer fights against guys with a pulse did he even attempt? So he needed those six months to prep for Mormeck or was he just scared of guys like Fury back when he actually had a chance against Fury?

Full of fear, not technically sound, has no resume to speak of, and achieved record lows, but all of that is forgiven because he almost got close to Louis yeah?

 

wat is telling, is when u are told the ratio to your face, and still think you've not been told.

Such a person cannot be helped or talked to.

 

would you like me to dig up where i said theirn opposition was good, it would save u starting an argument that you've already lost.

many times its been said by me, iggy, haye and pov are good defences.

many times its been said by me, kessler, reid, bika and lacy are good defences.

u flopped before u started.

next pick an argument that doesnt destory itself, for a change.

 

Keep ducking..

 

lol indeed that the original posts by the OPs I quoted were several pages ago.

so you flop again.

why did u want to flop four times in a row? intentional, truely? hard to believe.

 

fifth flop now.

u representing the Royal INstitute for Blind? Theres no other explanation for you missing the ratio posted directly in reply to you several posts ago now.

and to be fair, even blind people dont flop five times in a row. there must be another explanation.

 

Page 12 you cited that quote. You're clearly terrible with numbers.