haha I was thinking the same thing. Just like art robbed by the Nazis was given back to the rightful owners - even if bought 'legally' - AJ's belt could be considered stolen goods if Fury was on PEDs.
I saw a documentary back in 2006 called the **** of Europa which was about Nazi art theft during WW2. There's this lady in it who's got this sob story where she's pleading with the Austrian government to please give her back her grandmother's portrait. It has all this sentimental value. She remembers, how it used to sit above the fire place in the foyer when she'd go to visit her nana, and could she please have it back as a memento of dear old granny? Oh, and by the way, she's a Rothschild, it just happens to be one of the most famous paintings in the world, and she sold it for $135 million dollars the second she got her hands on it.
Both Tyson and Hughie never tested positive at all. Look at UKADs statement. They had slightly raised levels of nandrolone but no where near enough to actually cause a positive test. It was dealt with and forgotten about. That's why it took so long. When Tony Thompsons actual failed test took so long to come out it ps because he appealed it. It had a lot to do with Klitschkos team trying to find anything to get out of the rematch. The situation they have now is a god send for them. Klitschko might get to fight for stripped titles. By the looks, he's going to fight Ruiz Jr for a WBO title in December in Germany.
Is that why Fury refused to do a drug test this month when testers showed up and did not want vada testing to start until after a certain date and fury pulled out of the fight twice already is because wlad didn't want the fight... wtf do you listen to how stupid you sound. And isn't it fury camp who said trace amounts?
UKAD Statement on Tyson and Hughie Fury 03/08/16 In response to public comments made by Tyson and Hughie Furys' representatives, UK Anti-Doping can confirm that both boxers were charged on 24 June 2016 with presence of a Prohibited Substance. Mandatory Provisional Suspensions were imposed pursuant to Article 7.9.1 of the UK Anti-Doping Rules. The UK Anti-Doping Rules allow athletes to challenge the imposition of a Provisional Suspension and the independent National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) today lifted the athletes’ suspensions, pending full determination of the charges. These charges will be heard at a hearing before the NADP in due course. UK Anti-Doping will not comment further on the case until due legal process has been completed. So obviously it hasn't been dealt with and forgotten about. The doping agency itself put this statement out to correct those who believed the Furys that it was dealt with and forgotten about. That should say something in itself. From this particular statement it is clear that they both tested positive for prohibitive substances, which we know from elsewhere was Nandrolone, an anabolic steroid. We can see not only were they both charged, but also suspended. Only down to legal action from the Furys were the bans lifted. We can see they clearly have not been dealt with, but are merely pending until the full hearing in the first week of November. So it very, very clearly hasn't been dealt with or forgotten about, and is still on going. The major difference now being that Tyson Fury has refused to give a further sample for a second test.
Yeah it's like They think by pulling out and crying wolf it will all get forgotten about,or it's a clever move to have the belts taken off him and have made a champion in recess?