I see you in real life every time I see a ****** drooling and rubbing **** in his hair. I did use my vCash years ago and had hundreds of thousands of dollars. I was the 4th highest earner on the site. I lost it all on one big bet (Khan-Peterson), so now I don't **** with it. Let me know when your dumbass even breaks a thousand and then we can talk. You will never reach my heights on anything, not even vCash.
Good response man, best one in the thread so far. While the first men to fight women would be criticized and basically be in the no-win situation you stated if enough men and women fought those no-win situations would be eliminated. You say it's morally wrong for a man to hit a women, but its not morally wrong for a man to hit a man, or a woman to hit a woman? :huh Cecilia Braekhus would probably beat the likes of Paulie Malignaggi and Amir Khan. If she fought and beat one guy and lost to another or lost to both and put up great fights it would eliminate numerous stereotypes without a doubt.
Sorry but I simply refuse to continue to talk with someone with 700 V-cash or lower. If you want to continue this conversation please raise your V-cash higher. You need to prove your intelligence to me somehow.
Well I spose it is morally wrong for men to be hitting men and women to be hitting women to a degree.. but i ment its more so wrong on the fact that generally when a man and women are the same size the males are usually naturally stronger so it wouldnt be right. Ok fair enough she may beat them. i've never actually heard of her or seen her fight to make any predicitons or wateva.. But i still am goin to have to agree to disagree with you on the man VS women situation. if a few women fought and put up a good fight i still dont see it breakin any stereotypes. the way te majority of us fans are so quick to hype a prospect and to write off someone as a hype job would come into play to much. Most would put it down to a case of the man not being good enough. if Pauli lost everyone would be sayin he's shot and never ws that good blah blah.. the girl would get some hype and then once she eventually got KO'd by another male it would revert back to the "she should never have been fighting the men" "he just beat up a women he's didnt do anything special" I see your wherre you're coming from in theory but in practise i dont ever see it working. the majority of the women would loose to the majority of the men ranked about the same. There may be cases where the women get their wins but it wouldnt be enough to change the stereo type or make it acceptable to the general public...
It would be fantastic.... Every top 10 male boxers beat every top 10 female boxer two weight categories above him.... It would be a massacre, the ladies would be ktfoed out of the ring, and that, unfortunately, is the reason females are allowed to fight mens only in the films, where they always wins with ridicolous hits and fragile bodies... No, we will never see a man versus woman boxing match, but it would be great, bitches would finally shut up.
No way even the best of them are in the same league as their male counterparts from the same weight classes. Should she look for opponents in lower classes just to eventually find one she can beat? Or fight bums of her own size maybe? There's no point in it, even when we teake out the "men should not beat women" factor. It has nothing to do with sexism IMO.
It's pure biology, man. People keep thinking men and women are the same; it's not the case. How the hell can we ask for a woman to get in the ring with killers like Lucas Matthysse, Canelo, or Mikey Garcia. They wouldn't last a second against these elites. For anyone saying its sexist, here's a tranny beating up a female in MMA. Tell me this is not a horrible display. [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtmUY3PU7I4[/url]