Wonder why Sky are showing Bute vs Pascal??

or Groves?

 

Probably just got it for a decent price

 

Decent fight and bith well known here. Naff all boxing on domestically in January and it makes sense. Froch won't be figting the winner

 

Could do if one wins in style and very dominantly, but I highly doubt it. It's a B level fight.
Just is being shown due to what people have said: cheap for them to air, both fighters are well known due to Froch, and not much else on at this time of year.

Looking forward to seeing Perez on the undercard.

 

i'll tell you why - so boxnation has another weekend of no boxing and to **** off their subscribers. they know the xmas/january period is extremley quiet so taking this card means the last big fight (maidana/broner) boxnation had was 5/6 weeks ago!

 

It's a slow time of year and it's a good fight. Also Perez on the undercard is a bit of a story.

 

Froch ain't moving up and that's all she wrote

 

eddie hearns connections

 

Like I said before, neither Bute nor Pascal belong in the light heavyweight division, as they will both get knocked out by Kovalev, Stevenson, Shumenov...............they have no chance against them.............

 

Why does that mean they "don't belong"? What an utterly ridiculous thing to say. Complete bollocks. By that logic, you'd only have 3 fighters per division because the rest don't stand a chance! ****ing idiot.

 

He doesn't want fighters to make a living.

 

Hearn was talking up the Bute Pascal fight on Twitter. Saying good luck to Bute

 

Yeah I could have pictured Froch and Hearn screaming at the T.v last night cheering on Lucy Booty. That's another option out the window :hi:

 

On pure entertainment value,Box Nation wins this battle.They didn't pay a cent and a black screen or a replay would have been more fan friendly than the Bute-Pascal snore fest.:tired