So if Dawson didn't fulfill that he would have to relinquish the title? So, if he's going to do that anyway, whats the point?
No, I'm guessing Tarver would have took him to court. Sort of like when Lennox had a rematch clause against Rahman and Rahman/King wanted another fight first and Lennox threatened legal action or something. I think Dawson has to give a rematch, title or not.
Its true that IBF belt will be vacant because Dawson will not defend with Cloud or Woods... Woods is shot and cant win world title. He was very rosty with Muriqi and Tarver.
I admire Clinton for sticking at it... it was not good v Tarver... I just want another English fighter to take a few quid off the Yanks... Dawson would be a tough night at the office for Clinton..:think:think
Clinton just keeps coming, would be pretty mental if he became IBF champ again! Definitely shouldn;t be at that level