Workrate vs clean, effective punching

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vengeance, May 28, 2009.


  1. Vengeance

    Vengeance Certified Headhunter Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Mar 13, 2009
    Which side of the fence do you usually lean towards when you typically score fights? Do you prefer the fighter who throws and lands more punches or the fighter who lands the cleaner, more damaging punches? Of course we'd like to factor in both categories... but what if you could only choose one?
     
  2. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    Clean effective punching, if u ain't landing **** or landing anything of consequence then it don't really mean much to me other then your offensive arsenal ain't working or the other guys defense is better then your offense
     
  3. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I judge score my fights on ring genereal ship, clean effective punching, how a fighter dictates his game plan. Defense also play a big factor on my scorecards as well.
     
  4. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Depends.
    Sometimes clean,effective punching overcomes workrate and viceversa.
     
  5. CArealm

    CArealm Active Member Full Member

    734
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    I like Both styles, as long as its not a clinch or run for 12 rounds style.
     
  6. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    it does depend, but typically the guy who lands the cleaner and more effective punches gets my vote. there are a lot of other factors though.

    workrate is more of an amateur competition winner.
     
  7. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    both are important. it's really hard to seperate the two. Clean, effective punching should be more important but when looking at a fight like Hagler-Leonard, when one person is landing far more clean punches that are ineffective and the other is very aggressive but only landing very few (though highly effective) punches it makes it harder to score. Workrate ALONE shouldn't matter but if one person is working more AND landing more, despite it's effective it needs to count for something.
     
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    And now to take this to war:
    Hopkins vs Calzaghe
    What won that fight,clean,effective punching or workrate?
     
  9. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Depends, mostly clean punching.

    But if the difference in work rate and clean punching is vast, such as in Calzaghe vs Hopkins. Then workrate can take over.
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,177
    Jun 23, 2005
    Clean effective punching.
     
  11. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Clean effective punching!
     
  12. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    The fighter who lands the cleaner, more effective punches
     
  13. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
  14. Primenal

    Primenal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,266
    6
    Feb 10, 2008
    Hopkins was waaaay to inactive to get my vote. He should have done more, and his tactics also helped me give the decisions to Joe. Really though, I don't think he was really that clean/ effective anyways. If he were that effective...Calzaghe would have slowed down wouldn't you think? ;)
    We need to compare one of Floyd's fights.
     
  15. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Not when Joe's throwing 100 punches around you punk ass turtle neck pencil dick white boy.
    :good