Worlds Greatest Fighter Of The New Millennium

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by White Tiger, Aug 19, 2010.


  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Jones hardly beat anyone worth a wank in the 2000's.

    His best win was against Hill about 15 years ago.

    I'd say Pacquiao - a loss to Morales and two razor thin fights *cough* losses *cough* is more than offset by the rest of his slate.
     
  2. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Manner of victory should be taken into account too. Jones' and Mayweather's low risk pot shotting was hardly enthralling. Pac comes in, trying to break your jaw, and still wins. Much more entertaining.
     
  3. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    Calzaghe's achievments put him in with a good shout. How many boxers can go 46 fights unbeaten, no matter who they fight. He was 10 years as a world champion. He beat some of the biggest names of this generation.
     
  4. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Valuev managed it, can't believe he wasn't on the poll..
     
  5. White Tiger

    White Tiger Boxing Addict banned

    4,476
    4
    Aug 3, 2010

    Yeah - Hopkins and Jones both beaten on USA soil.

    Its a rare achievement for a Brit to go out there and do the business on the Yanks.
     
  6. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    He was nine years WBO strap holder and about one year as a real world champion. You're trying to tell me wins over old Eubank, Lacy, Kessler and a scraped victory over Bernard trumps Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton, De La Hoya, Cotto? Not to mention his plethora of other high-end wins that **** on Pudwill, McIntyre etc.
     
  7. White Tiger

    White Tiger Boxing Addict banned

    4,476
    4
    Aug 3, 2010

    :lol:

    And he lost his unbeaten record to David Haye


    So why isnt David Haye on the poll ?..................:lol::lol::lol:

    Because the Klits and Lewis are the only dominant heavys of this decade.

    Haye is a paper champ - and so was Valuev.
     
  8. Smudger

    Smudger Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    0
    Apr 1, 2009
    OP says it's not about legacy (by which he means opponents I guess) so I take it's on ability? If so Roy Jones.
     
  9. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    It was Chagaev who beat him mate, and I was just making a point that 46 wins undefeated doesn't mean much on its own.
     
  10. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    If you want to go into detail on opponents you could also pick Pacquiao's apart. Cotto wasn't allowed to fight him at 147. DeLa Hoya was drained. Hatton was finished about 5 years ago.
     
  11. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    It is the general consensus that Sugar Niko is the best ever and that he was robbed against Haye and would destroy both Klitschko's with one crunkercut.
     
  12. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    That makes it a whole lot worse!:lol:
     
  13. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Not picking anyone's opponents apart, just saying Pacquiao's opponents were better. You know this too.
     
  14. White Tiger

    White Tiger Boxing Addict banned

    4,476
    4
    Aug 3, 2010

    Correct.

    Simply who was the best fighter - at their prime in this Millennium.


    My choice was Roy Jones too - as he was still at the peak of his powers.

    Its not about legacy - however the manner a fighter like Manny Pac beat some big names - suggests he is right up there as one of the best of this Millennium.

    However - Roy Jones for me was the greatest. He toyed with Clinton Woods suggesting how good he really was.
     
  15. jdawg

    jdawg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,748
    0
    Jan 19, 2010
    Numbers, skill-set, draw power, opposition, achieving your potential, having no off nights... Put it all together its Floyd with Manny catching up fast.



    RJ and Toney are proven drugs cheats and are dq'ed.



    Lennox got sparked by a guy he shoulda beat, when you see Floyd do that. Tua, Botha, Grant... ok fighters but aint got Floyd beat. Best wins a grossly past it Tyson and Klitschko when trailing. Brings up next point.



    Vitali quit on his stool against undersized Chris Byrd along with the Lennox loss that was so important to him that for YEARS he tried to goad him out of retirement. He and his brother cant even get screened in the States, pulls great Germany crowds but since when was that the home of boxing?? Arreola was out of shape, Johnson awful, Danny Williams over-matched.. that aint a cracking record its a **** division that he's the best in.



    His 'little' brother has been sparked twice in the time period and are you saying wins over scared slow Eddie, short notice Chagaev, Peter and zzzzzzzzzzzIbragimov beats Floyds record?? come on flea.



    Joe ruled a **** division but unlike a lot on the panel when he had a bad night HE STILL won. Eubank fight was timed well, Lacy and Kessler wins were great the last 2 nights were paydays but not Floyd paydays. Joe's hand issues and over-protection means there'l always be question marks, Floyd only has 1- Manny.

    Hopkins is the only guy that can save your point re: Floyd and Manny for me. Clever that you didnt go as far as actually commiting to a name coz whatever anyone says now you can say -"Yea I meant him!" But he's your guy right now and he lost to 1 guy on that list and twice to 'No Intentions' at the weight he had his most success with De la Hoya and Trinidad being great wins of course. But how can you have a guy topping your Millenium man thats got beat by another contender??

    Floyd's 2 Castillo wins, not mentioned enough win over Corrales which is amongst his best, a very good Judah, Oscar at 154lb, huge fight with Hatton and any form of Mosely beats that of the others and only Manny can argue for me. Note I am not being totally bias as Gatti and JMM are both great name fighters but Gatti was a shell of the fighter and JMM doesnt belong at that weight. I also admit that both Floyd and Manny can beat whatever hand-wrap cheat or whoever they like but to be the genuine lb 4 lb best, undisputed they gotta get in the ****ing ring!!!!!

    According to some, particularly dan-b, belts count for ****. I dont completely agree but yes they've lost the credibility they had in history an so I havent even included them in my argument.

    In summary Floyd ticks all the boxes for the WHOLE time period we are looking at and he and Manny are the best fighters, the biggest draws with the best wins in the time