Worse Cheater: SHANE or MARGARITO

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hulkamania, Jul 23, 2009.


  1. Hulkamania

    Hulkamania What ya gonna do!!! Full Member

    2,312
    1
    Jun 30, 2008
    Both are legitimate cheaters.....

    One plastered and the other used steroids....

    Which one, did worse.... and why did Margarito get it worse than Mosley did?
     
  2. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    Margacheato, because those bricks could kill and permanently damage someone.


    Watch "Assault in the Ring by HBO"
     
  3. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Margo easily.
     
  4. Both the same for me...... Steroids couls also prove harmfull for the ooponent
     
  5. JMMisking

    JMMisking Member Full Member

    166
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Come on, this is a no-brainer. Obviously having hard solid material added into your gloves is far far worse. And Margo can hardly deny knowing they were put in there- unless he was a blind boxer- whereas it is arguable that Shane didn't know what he was taking was illegal.
     
  6. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Well answer yourself this question:

    Would you rather get hit by a guy w/ plaster in his gloves, or a guy on roids?
     
  7. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    Margo easy, and who knows how long he's been doing it...
     
  8. zarman

    zarman Guest

    :good
     
  9. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    I don't know about KILL. Seems like loaded gloves would more easily bruise or cut an opponent's face, but not necessarily end their lives. Unless of course you happen to load your gloves with brass or metal which would indeed cause severe blunt force trauma, but I don't think plaster rises to that level.

    It actually makes more sense to me that being jacked on steroids which make you physically stronger and more capable to do damage is actually the more dangerous infraction.

    I don't know, that's just my opinion. I'd like to hear a ringside doctor's opinion on the matter.
     
  10. levluger

    levluger Active Member Full Member

    670
    0
    Jan 2, 2008
    I'd rather not get hit by either, but plaster would be worse.... by the way, awesome avatar
     
  11. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
  12. MURK20

    MURK20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,519
    1,344
    Sep 26, 2008
    Why is everyone on this Mosley cheating ****? The man beat DLH the first time without them. Plus I don't see them having any effect on a boxer. Wrestler yes. Boxer no.
     
  13. sinner78

    sinner78 Active Member Full Member

    1,294
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Technically margo went into the ring with a weapon.
    But you cant deny the edge you gain with steroids. Steroid users who have come clean on their use admit that they get a huge mental/physical advantage from using roids. Like they have much faster mental reactions and see things unfold quicker.
     
  14. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    False statement.
    Never proven he has used "wrap's" in any fight before Mosley.
    (So "Technically" Margo never went into a ring with a weapon, even in the Mosley fight! He had his wrap's confiscated before he used whatever they claim they found.)
     
  15. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    I can take steroids and go into the ring with Cotto, but it doesn't mean I'm going to beat him. Why? Simply because I'm not as skilled as him. Yes steroids give you a physical advantage, but you that doesn't matter if you're not more skilled than the other fighter.