Worse Pacquiao Robbery?

Pac-JMM 3 was pretty questionable imo. I think the first two fights can go either way but that third one really should've gone to Marquez.

Anyways in terms of Pacquiao's losses I think Horn has a better case for his win than Bradley.

 

The Bradley decision was ridiculous. I didn’t see the horn decision as a robbery. Pac looked like sh*t in that fight. Horn came in with the eye of the tiger, whilst Pac came in thinking he was gonna have another Brandon Rios kind of night.

 

Let's see him beating Marquez the first time with ease but given a BS draw, or the Sanchez fight declared a draw & being screwed over, both the Bradley & Horn fights were really bad, embarrassing,

Atleast the judges awarded him the right decision in the Marquez 3rd fight, where Marquez had some decent round's in the middle making him actually believe he won while clearly losing the round's after,

One thing i have noticed throughout the years is how the commentators & i assume the judges miss allot of Pac's fast punches, as funny as it is they really do have to slow it down regarding him,

Since that Bradley fight they were essentially trying to push Pacquiao out in a way.

 

Rewatching the Horn fight would suffice, he wasn't effective at all even with that Referee allowing his continues use of illegal tactics, elbows, headbutts, you do know that's why Pacquiao had blood pouring all over him right?

People who love going on about Compubox sure do seem to become very quiet regarding the Marquez/Pac 3, Horn & Bradley fight's, gee i wonder why...........

 

If you score them round-by-round, both Bradley and Horn won about 3 rounds against Pacquiao, maybe 4. So it's a toss-up really.

But Pacquiao looked more dominant against Bradley because he didn't really have to step out of second gear, while Horn found a way to rough Pac up which made him look like he was in a more competitive fight, which is why a lot of people view Bradley as the worse robbery.

But they're even really.

 

If I could correct pacs resume fairly I would have him win vs Jmm 1, draw the second, lose the third.
Win vs bradley and Horn

Then all the controversy and robbery would be fixed for the general consensus imo.

 

Marquez 3 was the worst

 

I know the only time judges got it right & didn't rob Pacquaio, Marquez didn't win that fight in all objectivity.

 

Not at all.

Bradley and Horn had most media and fighters in a landslide for Pac.

With Pac-Marquez 3, it was split straight down the middle.

Pac-Marquez 1 was a straight robbery due to one judge's inability to do basic addition.

 

Having watched if Pac didn't go forward there would be no action, first few rounds Pac did better being the counter puncher then after he just went for it while Marquez looked ridiculous on the back foot throughout the fight which makes one very tired,

Marquez also kept on low blowing Pac where at a point Pacquiao himself had to alert the ref to do something to a least & Marquez conveniently kept stepping on his toes & still got beaten up, Marquez was so tired after the action packed rounds through 7-9 rounds he didn't have much after,

The Mexican crowd was rowdy from the start of the fight & made it seem Marquez was doing so much when in reality it was the opposite & would go very quiet when Pac landed.

 

Bradley because it broke Pacquiao's fantastic winning streak.
1-Bradley
2-Horn
3- Sanchez

Pacquiao should be at 65-6-1

 

For me he won both fights, but the Horn fight you can actually make somewhat of a case.

Bradley was a clear robbery, as there was no way to legitimately score it for Timmeh

 

Most fighters get decisions they don't deserve and get losses maybe they should have one. Should even out.

 

There are a number of fighters out there that only got favorable decisions their entire career, and others who only get decisions against them that (partially) destroyed their careers. Nationality and popularity play a large part of at what side of the decisons you usually are.

 

Very few. Big money makers. Canelo and Mayweather.