Plus Wlad is far more tactically aware than Bruno and can tailor a game plan based around his opponent, but a fight between the two would be an interesting match-up.
Id pick Bruno early, if it goes past round 6, Wlad would take him apart. But Bruno would be dangerous for even upto 7 rounds. Remember he rocked Tyson in the first round and was competitive with Lewis for 7 rounds.
Willie Pep once won a round without throwing a punch. Mike Tyson won a BELT without landing one. all thanks to Bruce
Good shout on Akinwande. Forgot that he actually held a title. Also good shout on what ppl are expecting from Wilder. He beat a solid guy who would be a formidable opponent for just about any titlist of the past, albeit limited. But certainly no worse than than many of the other paper titlists and title challengers of the past. :think
That Tyson in 89 vs Bruno gave one of his worst displays in the ring, even after his jail time, his timing was all over the place, just a hideous display. You saw when he came out of jail how badly he beat up Frank, and that was the Tyson that everybody says was past best also. I don't see why Wlad should be mentioned here, he's a class above Frank, a league above.
Frank was badly depleted by their second fight. I never said Frank and Wlad were in the same league, i said they had some similarities and a fight between them would have been interesting.
He isn't as BIG ; FAST ; SKILLED or POWERFUL ! He is in no way as good and shouldn't be compared . :deal
I think Bruno would be competitive with Wilder, as mid 90's McCall was probably around par with Stiverne. But Bruno was still a poor champion, as is Wilder.