Worse Vegas Robbery? Sturm vs Oscar Or GGG vs Canelo 2?

<------ That's all you had to post on the OP thread starter.

 

Come on Todd if it was anyone other than you I would open the debate with a fresh new page in the diary but it’s you and we all know you don’t have the most objective eye.

 

I remember that Sturm fight like it was yesterday. They were already promoting a fight between Hopkins and DLH as if it was a given that he'd get by Sturm. I'm pretty sure DLH forced catchweights in both of those fights (definitely the Bernard fight, I think both men had to come in at 158 lbs tops.)

Sturm probably beat him by around 2 points, but with Hopkins in the arena that night it seemed to me that the only way Sturm was going to get the nod was by one sided domination for 12 rounds or a knockout.

DLH and Vegas have a very long and bias history together (sans the Tito fight.)

 

GGG vs. Canelo 2 wasn't even a robbery. A controversial decision, maybe, but not a robbery.

 

The wrong person won, of course its a robbery.

 

Strum buys straps and fails tests
clen boy buys straps and fails tests
remember when the wbo were clen boys safe haven at 154 now he represents the wbc

 

chavez jr over zbik was also a robbery. there seems to be a pattern of robbery by mex fighters against euro fighters.

 

If I were you I’d ignore me to Todd, I’m glad you realize even with stats you’ll lose every time battling me. There’s been a small evolution in you that was likely motivated by several bans but we all still know your twisted mind revels in hate. I have no desire to trade venom with you in the cesspool labeled as a lounge, your misery is your own to burden.

 

I don't know of anybody that scored Oscar/Sturm to Oscar.

There are people who scored Golovkin/Canelo to Canelo, and plenty. Way more competitive rounds. Those fights were truly razor close.

 

I agree and should have stuck to the subject instead of dragging myself into a dance off with one of the resident supremacists.

 

I’ve met Paulie on numerous occasions and I’ve always respected his views. He brings up some excellent points especially with the criteria in which individuals judge fights and more importantly the rounds. My criteria has a heavy emphasis on who implemented a more effective change when compared to the first fight and that was Canelo for me. The number of punches landed and the difference between the quantity wasn’t significant enough to overrule the climate control that Canelo managed to introduce and maintain for the majority of the fight.

Accepting a 6/6 fight isn’t considered a robbery in my book but to each his own.

Damnit I forgot you’re ignoring me

 

Good post.