Ermm I meant "great fighters" not "fights" in the title!....I am thinking of a long losing streak after a great career, due to either fighting too long for the money or in a deluded belief they will get back to the top when clearly past their best. Jimmy Young, Ezzard Charles and Matthew Saad Muhammad spring to mind for me.
You really call Young and Muhammad '"great fighters"'? Charles is a fair call, although post Marciano he was getting up in age after a 'hard' career. I would add Evander Holyfield. He went from two tough fights with a prime Lewis, to struggling with Ruiz and never really rebounding.
OK maybe I should have said "respected" fighters? I just meant fighters who were highly rated and then went on to lose fights they would not have done in their prime.
Quite a few people stuck around for a lot of late career losses. Livingstone Bramble had a ton of them. Iran Barkley. Saad Muhammad absolutely.
Robinson was in his late 30s/40s when he 'slid'. Thus I think that he deserves any benefit of the doubt.
Has to be Roy Jones. In a matter of months he went from superman to journey man. He should have stayed at hw. Lewis and Vitali were on the verge of retiring. Tyson and Holy where ripe for the picking and a fight with Byrd in 05 would have been 50/50 and a great way to go out. Could have established a top ten legacy. Instead we have people questioning just how good he ever was. I personally am convinced it was the weight loss and that was visible against Tarver first time out, he didn't have it as a lhw any more.
I think Ken Norton is another example that comes to mind. He went on a great run from 1975 to 1978, and gave Holmes a terrific battle. In 1979 however, he fell down a steep slope and fast.
Agreed, Jones fell off the face of the earth about as fast as anyone I can think of. Not sure if wins over John Ruiz, Chris Byrd and aged versions of Tyson and Holy would have left him with a top 10 spot though. I think beating ruiz, then sticking to only one fight with Tarver, then calling it quits would have been enough.