worst decisions in world title fights

Some of the ones that immediatley ome to mind are Trindad-DeLaHoya, Whitaker-DeLaHoya, Peter-Toney 1 (I know it was an eliminator, but the wide margins on the sorecards for Peter was ridiculous) Mayweather-Castillo 1, Tarver-Jones 1, and Wright Taylor, even with Wright slacking the last round. What do you all have to say?

 

Personally, the only one of those decisions that I thought was bad was the Peter-Toney I fight.

 

Tarver Jones 1? Lol that was such a ****ing clear fight for Jones.

 

fenech-nelson 1...

 

dela hoya vs sturm.

 

Have you people forgotten Taylor vs Chavez???

 

By the rules, that was a fair stoppage.

 

By decisions, he means fights that went to the scorecards. That fight didn't go to the scorecards.

 

Whitaker - Ramirez anybody? Maybe the worst pro decision EVER (Jones in the olympics being the worst)! I mean, you could easier argue a shutout win for Pernell than you could a win for Ramirez.

 

That's the one!!

 

Whitaker-Ramirez, Hagler-Antuofermo, DLH-Sturm

 

Tyrone Everett vs. Alfredo Escalera
Julio Cesar Chavez vs. Pernell Whitaker
Jose Luis Ramirez vs. Pernell Whitaker
Elena Reid vs. Regina Halmich

And Gatsby, I don't think Taylor-Wright, Peter-Toney 1, Tarver-Jones 1, Whitaker-De La Hoya, and Mayweather-Castillo were terrible robberies. All of those fights could have gone either way. De La Hoya-Trinidad, in my opinion, was a bad decision, but not one of the worst robberies of all time.

 

Also Rabah Vs juan urango.

 

yea i may have exagerated wth worst, but they were all bad decisions in my eyes

 

Holyfield vs. Lewis 1.

This almost made me hate boxing!