Sad thing is....there are still idiots on here that think Ramirez and Chavez won (well, I seriously dont think any of them have seen the fights...and they refuse to post round by rounds...FURTHER proving my point).
I backed Toney in Toney vs Peter I so I am biased particularly given I would have won $38k had Toney got the decision
Naturally, I knew non-robberies (just close fights that could've gone either way) would be mentioned, such as DLH-Whitaker, Jones-Tarver 1 and Mayweather-Castillo 1. Get the **** outta here with Jones-Tarver 1. Tarver spent too many rounds in the middle of the ring doing jack ****, waiting and staring, leary of Jones's bodywork. That's got to be one of the most exaggerated "controversial" decisions ever. Here are some REAL robberies: Escalera-Everett Nelson-Fenech 1 Lewis-Holyfield 1 Briggs-Foreman M. Spinks-Holmes 2
i don't know about robbery, but I thought these weren't good decisions: Mosley vs. De La Hoya II De La Hoya vs. Ike Quartey Leonard vs. Hearns II Barrera vs. Morales I
tapia v medina whitaker v chavez sturm v dlh on versus 2 months ago kid diamond got his ass kicked by some mexican fighter. cant remember his name. diamond got the nod anyway.
The one that MADE ME SEVERELY PISSED OFF, was Sturm vs. De La Hoya- I had it 11 rounds to 1. 4th round slightly in favor to De La Hoya. And I was very generous to the golden boy. Andrey
That was a bad break, but I had the 2nd fight a draw between them so I guess it all worked out right.
Golota/Ruiz was a very sloppy fight, then again what Ruiz fight isnt. I think Ruiz was knocked down twice in that match too, I thought Ruiz lost that one also. Stoney his manager is a funny ass dude, hes always yelling about something.