How the **** can so many of you go with Hardy when J ustin ****ing Eilers fought for a title? EDIT- Why the hell is the name J ustin censored?
He's just the most recent guys is all, doubt most people here have seen the likes of Eilers and McGee ''fight'' and I dont blame them And the J word is censored because they show illegal streams on a website with a similar name
That's what makes it all the more damning a case against Luter - it SHOULD have been for the title - After being in the house for a couple of months, having known what was coming to him, having the time to have "sparring" in the form of three fights against pretty much as good a pool of sparring partners as you could get, to not make weight!?!?!?! Worst title challenger ever.
This was the first name that popped into my head...and he challenged for both the 185 and 205 straps!
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and a question like this is very subjective. I'm not saying that Eilers must be your pick but if you actually saw that Arlovski/Eilers "fight" and you really think that Hardy is worse than Eilers, you don't know **** about fighting.
I wasn't the only person to choose Hardy or mention his name here. Perhaps you better help the others that did mention him with their opinions too