I bet that you are the only guy on this forum, who has seen the fight, (you have seen the fight??) who thinks that Reid lost.
August v Burton I is the fight in semi-recent memory that always comes to mind when these threads get posted. I mean Augustus was penalized for spinning out of a clinch... huh?
No, it's the Ottke fight we're talking about, not the Calzaghe fight. Patriotism for your fellow countrymen is fine, but you have simply gone too far. Ottke always had the advantage of helpful judges and refs, and the Reid fight was a classic example. Your blind loyalty to one of the most overrated cheating boxers in many a year is quite amusing. I suppose you would claim that Reid never knocked Ottke down?????
Virchis-Sprott Regina Halmich-Elena Reid (first fight) Forrest-Quartey They are worst robbery ,IMO. De La Hoya-Trinidad Mosley-De La Hoya(2 nd fight? Holyfield-Lewis(1) Holyfield-Lewis(2) They are bad decisions.
Armando Muniz - Jose Napoles http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=H8O8BakFlBc Muniz beats the crap of Napoles for 11 rounds, then the ref stops the fight. Go over to talk with Sulaiman for about 5 minutes, then declares Muniz tko even though it was Napoles, rhe champ fighting in his home country who was cut and beat up. Discusting.
DLH-Tito was a clear scoring robbery. One judge had Tito winning by 7-4 before the last round. Then, DLH ran from Tito in the last round and Tito wins the 12th clearly but the judge (Roth) gave the round to Oscar because he realized that if he had scored the fight 116-112 for Tito it would be too wide. Roth knew DLH deserved AT LEAST a draw.
That is the most insane thing I've ever heard. (Barring the last post by China Hand Joe.) You are obviously the only correct judge of that fight on this forum.atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch
What I said is true, I don't need to suck DLH's balls to post that. The same way I thought PBF and Sturm clearly bet and outclassed DLH.