Wot is the fatman Naz lad smoking??!

Erm, probably because he's not in line for Khan's title? Only Pacquiao's?

 

jesus, naz was one of the best british fighters of all time and on a BRITISH boxing forums u idiots cant wait to lay into him... whether u agree with him or not don't slate his achievements...

 

The only thing similar between Kell and Naz is the Ingles. Other than that they're nothing alike in the slightest.

 

Don't forget the smoke n mirrors switch hitting, which is cringeworthy. I think he walked into a jab the very first time he attempted it in the fight.

What Naz had was a mule punch to bail him out.

 

I couldnt believe it when he done that vs Jenning's. He switched and then took a full jab in the face that jerked he's head back. Kell can crack somewhat but he doesnt have anything close to the power or unorthodox style that Naz had. Its only a matter of time before he gets KO'ed though. He's far to stiff and upright.

 

Yep, he fights off the wrong foot, leads with hooks without it being effective and hasn't got nowhere near the reflexes of Hamed. That no chin to chest tuck is not technique. He's in trouble if he struggles at the weight as well because he seems to have maxed out...don't think he weighs up that much either, which is a problem with these new age welters.

 

Because Pac Man at FW, wasnt as good he is now.
He was prone to brawling and had very little defense and Naz hit like a MW. Barerra cleverly outboxed Naz and avoided his power, this is something i dont think Pac could/would have done at FW. You need to stop thinkin of WW Pac and think of the FW one.

Also, you dont necessarily have to beat someone in order to prove you can beat someone else. Thats just plain daft. If Frazier beat Ali, and Foreman beat Frazier, Doesnt necessarily guarantee that Foreman would beat Ali.
You can replace Frazier, Ali Foreman with Taylor, Hopkins Pavlik
Tyson, Tucker, Douglas
Styles make fights, naz woould have KTFO pacman at FW