Would 23 year old Floyd struggle with shot to **** Paulie Malgnaggi?

He did at times, lost at least 4 rounds (i gave Paulie 5), while Khan lost none, hatton lost only 1.

Floyd wouldn't even lose a min of a round vs Paulie.

 

when youre an 11 to one favorite and end up with a split decision, thats a struggle.

 

Power Punches:

Broner: 214/418 51%
Paulie: 94/376 25%


Like I said......Broner didn't struggle at all. No problems for the problem.

 

Tom Miller should never judge another fight again. This was even worse then the Mayweather/DLH split decision.

 

The only thing Mayweather and Broner have in common is the colour of there skin that is all, Prime Broner wouldn't even get close to a Shot Mayweather.

 

Unbeaten Cotto won 116-111 on 2 cards and 115-112 on the other, and he's clearly the best of the 4 at this point. He didn't completely outclass Paulie.

 

a split decision was fair, imo. the scores themselves were suspect, though.

 

True, but they was nothing stopping him jumping up 2 weight classes

 

When did I say Broner dominated Malignaggi? I said he didn't struggle. I said Paulie gave him no problems. Those things are both true.

 

this!

 

Why are you avoiding the fact that Khan won every round vs Pauline and stopped him?. The Pauline that lost to Cotto in that war was a young undefeated Pauline.

Broner did the worst out of those fighters vs Paulie.

 

But you're talking about 4 fighters whom all had no problems with Paulie. Broner had the "most" problems because it took him a couple rounds to get warmed up but once he did he utterly outclassed Paulie.

 

A 23 Year Old Floyd Would Have Had Paulie Out Of There Or Have The Ref Stop It Inside 4 Rounds. If You Watch Floyds Early Fights Its Scary How Fast He Was And In The Lower Weight Classes He Had The Power.