Would 60-40 to the winner of Pac/Money be a fair and effective solution?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bogotazo, Jun 21, 2010.


  1. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Mayweather has repeatedly said that this fight is easy work for him. Regardless of whether or not that's true, he in all likelihood thinks he is going to be the victor. Pacquiao is always confident, to the point of hiring a victory concert starring himself as the singer.

    Since everyone is tired as **** of waiting for the fight, and the seemingly worst part of this negotiation process-the blood test- has been described to be resolved, is this the best way to split the purse?

    I think personally that this should be done more often in fights. At least in this specific case though, with the two pound-for-pound kings battling for dominance, it makes sense that the stakes get raised in such a way.
     
  2. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Oh good, someone hadn't started a thread like this for a few minutes.
     
  3. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    We will all know come end of the month whether this fight will go ahead.
     
  4. wellsini

    wellsini Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,266
    16
    Jul 6, 2009
    Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh!!!

    YES!

    I might start a Pacqiuao v Mayweather fight thread including stuff about PAC being on roids and a 60-40 split and who would win and why its not on all rolled into one
     
  5. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    Sounds good to me.

    Maybe 70/30 with a KO
     
  6. prideofvbeach

    prideofvbeach Top 10 Pound-For-Pound Full Member

    2,557
    0
    Sep 26, 2007
    That's the way it always ought to be.
     
  7. zoo

    zoo Active Member Full Member

    1,424
    2
    Sep 14, 2006
    Fighters always talk that **** but nobody actually follows though. I think the closest it came is when Hopkins bet Joppy 50K he'd KO him and didn't so he paid up. Does anybody know a big fight were they actually did a lion's share to the winner?
     
  8. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    is decent idea not that you have been the first to bring it up but if one fighter hapened to get robbed then its pear shaped
     
  9. FASTHANDS

    FASTHANDS New Member Full Member

    86
    1
    Jun 19, 2010
    No, 60/40 is to wide of a gap. 52/48 sounds reasonable.
     
  10. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,554
    14,073
    Mar 5, 2006
    if it were by knockout..yes. But if it were up to judges..hell no.
     
  11. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    Good alternative!
     
  12. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    This kind of arrangement rarely ever happens. I wish it happened more. Things would be so much easier with regards to negotiations.
     
  13. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    No, emmanuel would end up filing a lawsuit after he loses and only gets 40%.
     
  14. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Sounds good to me. Except I don't know if this has ever been done before. When you get money involved in outcomes of fights, strange things can happen if you know what I mean.
     
  15. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Just make it 50/50, jesus. I thought that should have been obvious by now.