Would 60-40 to the winner of Pac/Money be a fair and effective solution?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bogotazo, Jun 21, 2010.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    I think Hopkins - Jones was something like that, or that was something that was talked about. Not sure how the pay was done ultimately.
     
    Slacker, Jun 22, 2010
    Slacker, Jun 22, 2010
    #16
  2. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    I think it was 60/40 for a knockout if I remember correctly. I suppose that's safer, like others said, a paycheck depending on the outcome may influence the decision-making process, but whether or not it's a knockout is out of the hands of the judges.
     
    Bogotazo, Jun 22, 2010
    Bogotazo, Jun 22, 2010
    #17
  3. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    in theory it sounds great, but in reality it leaves even more room for corruption in an already corrupt sport
     
    timmyjames, Jun 22, 2010
    timmyjames, Jun 22, 2010
    #18
  4. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Or...When and if Floyd loses he'll have the convienently built in excuse that PAC is on something and was somehow able to beat the tests regardless. And of course be upset that he ended up taking the huge risk of facing his toughest challenge and not being compensated moreso while earing his first loss as a pro.:roll:
     
    charlievint, Jun 22, 2010
    charlievint, Jun 22, 2010
    #19
Page 2 of 2