I remember seeing Greg Page spar Tyson, where Rooney looked frustrated that Tyson was getting hit so often. My comment wasn't necessarily saying, that i didn't believe Tyson wasn't fully mentally prepared for Douglas. Basically I was saying why in this fight did Tyson's form dip considerably ? Because in previous fights he had shown no signs of it. And even in fights after vs Tillman, Ruddock, his form was considerably better. It just seems odd to me that in his first career before prison, he had only had one bad performance and that was against Douglas. I'm just wondering if it's a bit of both, Tyson's preparation obviously wasn't what it could've been. But also Douglas regarding his size, ATG jab, and form, was also the deciding factor aswell.
The only way to know for sure is if we were actually able to see it happen. But I Think that 1988 Tyson was better than 1990 Tyson
Haha! “Tokyo Douglas” has taken on a persona of mythical proportions! He’s like Bigfoot or The Loch Ness Monster. Our grandchildren will be asking us…”Pappy did Tokyo Douglas really exist? And did he really destroy the Baddest Man on the Planet?” “ Well Timmy, (grandsons always seem to be called Timmy) I was just a boy when I saw this incredibly super beast crush Iron Mike Tyson into the dust without breaking a sweat…then in a flash, like lightning he was gone! He was bigger than Kong, stronger than Hulk and faster than Bolt. We will never see his like again!” Anyway, back in the real world and to answer the question…1988 Tyson beats any version of Douglas…even the mythical Tokyo incarnation. And I’ll be sure to tell Timmy that..
I noticed as early as Bruno 1, that his head movement, footwork and combinations didn't have the same harmonious fluidity, as they had back in 87. Clearly, nothing to the extent as vs Douglas. I suspect losing to Buster was due a combination of less focus on boxing in general, particularly poor preparation for that specific fight and Douglas on that night being good enough, at the right style of fighting, to beat that version of Tyson. I think Tyson of 87 beats Tokyo Douglas. Tyson never got back to his 87 version, but he did regain some discipline post Douglas, at least for a bit. The Tyson that beat Ruddock vs Tokyo Douglas would be a tough pick for me.
I agree completely, except you meant what the OP asked, 1988 Tyson? I think we agree 1987 also beats him, Yes who knows if Tyson who fought Rudock either time would have enough to win? Possibly.
Great post Vic. The name Timmy is always good - there’s also Jimmy Capt Ovah - “We’ll, my goodness, Scraps is a boy dog, isn’t he?” Jimmy - “Yeah!”
Though, IIRC, Bruno made it pretty rough in there, to expressly unsettle Mike and he did stun Mike at least once. Prior to that, Mike looked like the same Mike, having dropped Frank with a right shortly after opening bell - after that, Frank began sticking it to him. I think a lot of Mike’s less than ideal performances tend to over focus on what Mike allegedly wasn’t rather than the what the opponents were and the obstacles they presented. Of course there is provision for Mike being a bit less than himself - but I don’t necessarily agree with the extent of how much less he was within himself. In fair balance, a “bit less” for a fighter of Mike’s ilk can equate to a greater drop in overall effect as compared to fighter of other styles who are slightly under par in themselves. Mike’s own poster year 88 involved at least two opponents who were impaired themselves, given their own context - but Mike absorbed absolute credit for those victories, building into his aura of invincibility without due deductions. The first step in attempting to answer the question might be to ask: how Douglas, in his own right, compared to Mike’s opposition in 88? Imo, I believe Tokyo Douglas was notably superior. And, Douglas was already starting to pound on Mike before there was much of window to assess Mike in his own right - so that can’t be completely divorced from the dynamic. It was also Mike who famously said that everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth/face - so, if one subscribes to same, it’s a two way street and Mike wasn’t immune to same.