Would a retired Mayweather rank above Marciano, or not?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Apr 1, 2012.


  1. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    I'm not holding it against Mayweather that he's fighting in the era he's in, but if we are going to compare across the eras we need to use a fair standard.

    Why should modern fighters benefit from the fact that they have more titles and weight divisions to boast about winning in ?

    People are saying stuff like "Mayweather fought more championship fights" , "Mayweather fought more world ranked fighters" etc. , so it needs to be pointed out that a lot of those wouldn't have been championship fights or ranked contenders in Marciano's era.
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Hm, tough one. Marciano has the better names in Charles, Walcott and Moore. Mayweather has more depth. Mayweather has better longevity and weight-jumping credentials. But Marciano on the other hand was a smallish hw in an open end division. Which counts for more? Both have great achievements but Marciano´s record is still standing after around 50 years which is quite a unique achievement. Very hard to compare.

    Right now, I´d say they are about on par, I wouldn´t have a problem with either beeing higher. But I guess in the end Mayweather will end up higher since he will add even more depth and perhaps also some more quality to his resume.
     
  3. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    It's not that I don't get your point about multiple weight classes and belts (I very much do, and agree with it) but in this day and age we have to take it for what it is.
    We'll never see eight weight classes again nor will we ever see unified champions in every division. In my mind, all we can do is go on what we've got.
    That does lead to inflated achievements, but it is what it is.
    Let's leave Mayweather's weight-jumping out of the equation for a bit.

    Based alone on his career at 130, I think a case can be made for ranking him higher than Rocky anyway. (Especially as I rate his skillset higher.)

    (I personally think your last point is conjecture. We can't say for sure either way.)
     
  4. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    Why can't we just try to weigh those achievements accurately and fairly against the achievements of fighters in other historic environments ?

    That seems to be what people try to do around here on a normal day.

    No one seems to say Armstrong winning titles in 3 weight divisions stands as a lesser achievement compared to Ray Leonard winning titles in 5 weight divsions, or only half as good as Oscar DeLa Hoya winning in 6 !


    I don't see it.
    Maybe I don't know enough about his career to get a true grasp of what his great victories are. People are saying he fought much tougher opposition than Marciano did, but I can't see it.
    I'm open-minded about it, but at best it's very close between the two.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,727
    21,985
    Sep 15, 2009
    Floyd has been the best fighter in the world from sfw to ww. In a couple of month time he'll have stretched that lmw as well.
     
  6. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    This content is protected
    .:rasta
     
  7. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Just as with Rocky, there are cases to be made for the opposition.

    De La Hoya was a Top 3 LMW and WBC titlist coming off a TKO6 of Mayorga having previously failed against Hopkins at 160 a couple years prior.

    Mosley was the #2 rated WW (#3 P4P) and WBA champ. In an act that would make stonehands proud, Mayweather refused to pay their sanctioning fees.

    Marquez was an opponent Floyd took a lot of heat for fighting at the time being he was the LW champ albeit the #2 P4P. Mayweather completely dominated and shut him out. More than 2 years later, Marquez fights Pacquiao (a 3rd time at highest weight) in what many felt should of been a draw at worst. A little retrospective boost.

    In 1998, he defeated Lineal/WBC/#1 Ring rated SFW Gernaro Hernandez (38-1) whose seen induction to WBHOF; In 2001, #1 Ring rated SFW Diego Corrales (33-0) whom Mayweather was an underdog against, in a near flawless beatdown (dropping Corrales five times); In 2002, WBC/#1 Ring rated LW Jose Luis Castillo (45-4) X2 for Ring LW Title, considered Lineal crown; WBC/#1 Ring rated LWW Arturo Gatti (39-6); Ring WW Champ Carlos Baldomir (43-9), hadnt lost in eight years.

    Most recently beat Victor Ortiz, WBC/#2 Ring rated WW and will fight WBA/#1 Ring rated LMW Miguel Cotto May 5th.


    Very short on time, just a quick overview for you.

    Cheers :thumbsup
     
  8. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    :lol:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQA4iFfgZDE&feature=youtube_gdata_player"]A[/ame]
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    It's hard to compare a HW to a SFW-WW, I think a better comparison would be Henry Armstrong, compare their opposition and Mayweather's really doesn't look worse in my view.
     
  10. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Yeah, thanks. :good

    Just as I thought, not clearly better or tougher opposition than Marciano.
    They both beat some good fighters, that much is clear.
    Like you say, cases can be made for both of their opposition.
     
  11. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,228
    5,508
    Aug 19, 2010
    If he beats Cotto in a impressive way then I think it´s extremely close.......
    I would still say Marciano has the edge in terms of who he won, especially because Charles (Walcott is not an ATG to me, and Moore is a very good win but not great IMO all things considered)....
    But, I consider Maywather a great force H2H...and it would be very close to me......
    Anyway, I don´t rate neither very high to be honest. (I don´t have a list but both would be outside top 20 I´m sure of that)
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Both in the 80-100 bracket for me. Neither are amongst the true cream of the crop.

    Marciano better names, Floyd has a manafactured consistency that's hard to rebut even though I find it a cynical ploy at making a fighter look far better than the sum of his parts. Marciano beat guys around his weight, Floyd has had 'P4P success', which I don't find particularly impressive in this day and age at all.

    So, either way not fussed but they're about as great as each other. Marciano was better though IMO.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    You've lost it pal.
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,727
    21,985
    Sep 15, 2009
    Pp, stray away from henry v floyd comparisons. Do yourself a favour.
     
  15. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Mayweather hasn't done anything I'd consider a exceptional "pound for pound" victory, in the classic sense.
    Most the guys he fights are close to his size, a lot of the good ones are smaller, (the biggest names are older than he too).

    Marciano beating good men 12 or 25 pounds heavier than him is more impressive, in my opinion.
    Mayweather is a legit welterweight, a big 140 man at the least. It's not like he's going around beating up light-heavies, or proper middles even.