Would Audley Harrison Be the Worst Heavyweight Champ ever If he Won?

Well, he would be better than Haye, obviously.

 

guys like audley don't beat guys like haye. This fight is to milk money and fill an arena

 

the main word is IF. he is not going to win. i mean seriously where to do people come out with this **** that he might win? the guy got hammered by rogan, who wasnt even a proper boxer. he had less skill and technique than a blind baby with one leg to stand on.

Audley was horrible against Sprott as well, if only Sprott was to stay composed then audley would not be fighting haye. but haye has made this fight happen to raise the stock of heavyweight boxing further, in the Uk and show how much interest he generates which would allow him to compete in the negotiations with K2.

Fact is: Audley is shite. David Haye will maul him. The END (of fraudley)

 

he didnt. it was quite a close fight actually, and harrison had him in real trouble at one point.

 

what about vitali he quit against byrd of all people then he quit against lewis or at least his corner did, they had put paper stitches in the eye no way would he be allowed to continue after such an act

 

Maybe , up there with

seldon
carnera
bentt
ruiz
valuev

 

the WBA love to BOREify & kill the heavyweight division.:-(

 

I don't care if his mother stopped the fight, Peter was a world class fighter. Audley has never beaten a top 30 fighter. Case closed.

 

Carnera does not belong there. Not by a long shot. He defeated a Top20 atg to become champ.

 

Probably him or Michael Bentt.

 

In a fight that many believe was fixed...

 

Bull****. That´s a myth created later on. Show me the sources for it. They are all not of the time of the fight but from later on. Carnera was a serious contender in his time and actually had quite good skills.

 

well in this scenario he would have beaten haye. i dont think peter has beaten anyone that good. Case re-opened.

 

What about Leon Spinks?