Would Bradley be a cherry pick for Floyd?

and you'd pick wrong.

 

Whatever. We'll only know if they fight. You have your pick, I'll have mine.

I think Bradley s style is all wrong for the current Floyd.

 

Any time there is a better fight out their for a fighter to take and they fight someone else it's a cherry pick.

 

No you are a childish "nut licker" because you seek attention through pathetic threads like this.

Is Bradley a cherry pick? No. It would be a very legitimate WW fight. It would be the best fight on Floyd's resume since Marquez in 2009. No, it is not because Pacquiao recently beat Bradley, it is because Bradley is easily the best WW behind Floyd & Manny.

You don't have to drive your personal agenda through each and every post/thread you create. We get it.

You don't like Pacquiao.
You really like Floyd.

Yes, Floyd is your favourite boxer.
Yes, we understand you like to discredit Pacquiao.

No, we do not care that your favourite fighter is Floyd.
Yes, we do know who Floyd is, so you can stop reminding us of your passion for the man.

No, Floyd does not read this forum, so no, he does not care what you think.

And last but not least, welcome to my ignore list, you are accompanied by the other delusional and biased posters.

Also, have a read here. You clearly need help.

[url]http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/histrionic-personality-disorder[/url]

This content is protected

:hi:

R.I.P Phaggot.

 

@kiwi_boxer I think the answer is yes and no if he fights Tim coming off the Pac loss all you will here about is him cherry picking a fighter that just lost so he knows he can beat. If TB gets a reasonable win I think a lot not all fans will consider it a good win.

I don't agree with the statement. Bradley is clearly the best behind Pac/May. I had Brad just edging Pac I (I know), Ruslan, & JMM so I had Bradley#2/Maidana #3 going into Pac-TB II right now I have Pac#2/Porter#3/Marcos#4/Brad#5. Marcos giving a tough fight to PBF is worth more than TB giving a close fight to Pac. So I have Maidana #4, Porter is beating actual top ranked WW's who have beaten WW so he's 3, and Pac beat TB when he was #2.

TB has a HOF type resume but most of that is at JWW can't be the best WW when your best WW wins are vs guy's who've never beaten a real WW.

 

A PAC fan is different to a *******. I'm a PAC fan aswell as a floyd fan. *******s are completely unreasonable and in all probability clinically ill.

 

not so sure Bradley is the best after pac and may...i think at least porter,thurman and khan beat him... and maidana is ranked below Bradley but his style represant a way more difficult match up for a 37 years old Floyd.

 

There's no such thing as a non cherry pick for Floyd. Floyd could go up and beat GGG at 160 (not saying he can), and there would be some excuse after.

 

Mayweather would be heavily favored to beat Bradley, and rightly so, as would Canelo, so I don't see where some of these people are getting the idea that a win over Bradley would be better.

 

Bradley is at the level of PLODODNIKOV and JMM. Not at the level of Floyd.

 

Yep, they go from being "avoided" by him to cherry picked, green, drained, shot bums as soon as he signs to fight them.

 

It's the best fight you can make at 147 lbs besides Pacman.

I'd also like to see Thurman fight Porter and the winner of that match gets a shot at Mayweather.

 

Floyd should not fight Bradley unless he gets a belt.

 

Bradley is a top notch boxer

Cast iron chin
Slick solid and usually great stamina

Against other slick black boxers he has destroyed and dominated

Floyd at 37 isn't the same boxer

He's slipping and someone like Bradley could take him