Would Bruno Have Had More Chance Of Winning A Belt Against The 2000 Onwards Heavy S?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jun 15, 2017.


  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,720
    20,199
    Apr 3, 2012
    I'm referring to 1989 Holyfield and prime Wlad.
     
  2. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,390
    40,544
    Jan 8, 2017
    Apologies, thought we were still talking about 2000 onwards versions. 89 holyfield and prime Wlad would both defeat Bruno with out a shadow of a doubt.
     
  3. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,312
    19,582
    Jun 25, 2014
    I agree.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,000
    28,017
    Feb 15, 2006
    If you can’t win a belt after Lewis retired, you probably won’t in any era!
     
    Fergy and Man_Machine like this.
  5. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,415
    Jun 9, 2010
    Overall, Bruno would have done well. I would say Vitali presents the biggest and most likely insurmountable challenge for him.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,390
    40,544
    Jan 8, 2017
    It was a bad time for the heavy s janitor. Took a long time to start producing fight s that people gave a **** about. We had such a good era in the 90 s for heavy s and when Lewis left it went to pieces. Can't lay it all on the klitschko s but it seemed such a weak division for a long time. But I do see a change happening now.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,297
    49,750
    Apr 27, 2005
    He'd have a better chance yes.