would calzaghe have beaten a prime james toney at 168lb

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by faisal, Nov 9, 2008.


  1. Diablo

    Diablo Active Member Full Member

    1,365
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    I think Joe would be too fast for Toney, like someone said he was flat footed at times and struggled with slick fast boxers.

    Eubank may have won a SD. Probably not.

    Benn would hav got stopped by Toney. James takes his best shots and the hard counters take their toll.
     
  2. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,276
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    I'd narrowly favour Joe over Toney. Toney however would thump Benn and win a close one over Eubank.
     
  3. DON1

    DON1 ICEMAN Full Member

    5,200
    1,178
    Apr 6, 2006
  4. BIG WORM

    BIG WORM Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,553
    0
    Mar 23, 2008
    yh i think calzaghes got the adaptability to beat toney, toneys a good counter puncher, it'd be like hopkins fight, but more cleaner puncher
     
  5. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Well, Calzaghe would have. Eubank has about a 40% chance. Benn has absolutely no chance.
     
  6. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    27,072
    9,984
    May 29, 2007
    Toney has beaten and stopped even faster more awkward southpaws like Michael Nunn 2nd to Nunn who was virtually unbeatable until he ran into Toney.
     
  7. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    I have gone back and forth on this match up. But I beleive if Calzaghe was fighting on his best day and Toney was fight on his best day, that joe Calzaghe would get the decision.

    JC will have problem and could be hurt in the fight but i am forever amazed by Joes adaptability and with that, his speed and workrate he would get a decision over James Toney.

    Calzaghe UD.