Would Hatton have beaten Oscar quicker than Pac

yes it does mr. amsterdam. :yep

 

Speed kills, Oscar couldn't catch Pac, he woulda caught Hatton. Oscar looked the much stronger man in that ring, whenever they got into a heated exchange or Oscar held him and threw blows, he got the better of it and Manny very quickly got away. Oscar will land on Hatton and KO him. Just because Pac made it look easy doesn't mean he was easy...

 

Dlh didn't look as if he lacked discipline regardless of what the talk was. He's been in the sport a long time. Dlh knew what it took to win. Nacho, Valero and others...they have their opinions. Dlh got his weight down below 147 so how much discipline did he lack? Dlh looked old, and if you couldn't see that then you are blind. Pac could've fought all of the guys you named above as well as the big names.

In between fighting the big names, he took on Larios, Solis, 3k Battery I think, and a couple of other non descript fellows...I'm just guessing off the top of my head when he could've faced the aforementioned. I say a lot of positive things about PAc. You either missed them or just haven't caught them yet.

All PAc has to do is beat someone great and in their absolute prime, and I'm totally on the bandwagon. Right now, I know the man can fight. Nobody does what he did to Juan Marquez in his prime and be accused of not being able to fight. Pac can fight, I just want to see him in a struggle with a peer in his prime! I haven't seen an encore from Pac yet. I'm still waiting.:bbb

Analyze the best ever in this sport, and see how many fighters they fought in their prime. Big names don't mean anything if they aren't in their absolute prime. Those big names makes the resume look good, but I need substance. Duran reigned for almost 7 years at lightweight, and none of the guys he beat have the names of Barrera or Morales. Buchanon and Dejesus might be the biggest names on Duran's light resume, but Duran fought a bunch of capable prime fighters at lightweight. He marched his 72-1 record into the Sugar Leonard fight and he won.

 

No it doesn't. Hatton didn't take the Dlh fight for obvious reasons. You just don't know them, and don't care to even do the research. Take your head out of PAc's ass and learn why fights are made and aren't made lol...geez!

 

Dlh was old. Dlh couldn't catch PAc, but would've caught Hatton...!!!??? Comical lol. You have to be the worst of the worst to utter such nonsense. You didn't even pick PAc to win lol. You were scared for him lol. 35 is 35, and you can talk that bull if you want, but had Hatton fought Dlh at 147, he would've beaten Oscar up too

 

so aside from a malignaggi fight set already, why did hatton's team did not accept an offer to fight his boss oscar when the scheduled 2nd fight of oscar and floyd was scrapped in september? teach me please your highness.

 

you are barking at the wrong tree mr. amsterdam. dangerousity picked pac even with the inherent size disadvantage. you only picked pac because you have an agenda so if pac wins, you will discredit it to make your boy calzaghe the p4p king. very transparent. :yep

 

Hatton was scared and PAc wasn't...ok? Please go away...your nuthugging is embarrassing:nut

 

And you came up with this scenario...all by yourself didn't you lol. A man who didn't even believe PAc would win lol...

 

pacman is fearless. :good

 

your only mad coz i saw thru your agenda. :yep

 

Hatton? Errrm, I don't know. Hatton likes to hold too much and that kinda stuff can't take away from your offense.. Margo on the other hand would have destroyed that version of De La Hoya in about half tha time it took Pac. 4 or 5 rounds at the most.

 

Not at all

 

We don't know.

 

Why don't you tell everyone what my agenda is lol...:nut You aren't a Pac fan. You root against him when he looks as if he will lose and nuthug him when he wins lol... Doubter!