Would Hatton have beaten the DLH that Pac beat on that night?

Oscar was not himself in that fight.

 

ofcourse hatton would have beaten DLH that night , but would he have looked as good as pac doing it? im guessing no

 

not seen many hatton fights have you?:roll:


go watch the magee,tackie,olivera&thaxton fights:deal

 

yes hatton would've beat oscar that night,oscar was like a zombie

 

I think it's the second one which is stupid.:huh

 

Maybe but not quite. I think Pacs speed and excellent execution of a fight plan made the fight easier and not anybody can do the same.

 

Yeah, I think he would have. It wouldn't have been as one sided, but Hatton would have beaten De La Hoya that night in my opinion.

 

finally found this thread after a week. bump

 

no

 

this guy knows what he is talking about. :deal

 

No

 

No.
Bump.
Bump.
Bump.

 

Lee Beard woulda told Hatton to try to bulldoze Oscar w/ his hands down his side & tell him not to move his head. Lee should just stick to karate & leave boxing to the real

 

Screw the original proposition of this thread! This is the question that needs to be answered now!:deal

 

OK I'm going to write this in capitals as it contains the answer NO ARGUEMENT.

At the end of the PAC-DLH bout Oscar's corner said:
'There's not point continuing - HE'S JUST TOO FAST!'

The reason why DLH didn't throw any punches was because (like Hatton) he just didn't know how to deal with PAC speed and power. The same with Hatton - as soon as he felt PACs power and speed his gameplan (aka using headmovement, footwork and DEFENSE) went out the window. He tried to bully PAC in the first hold but PAC just bullied him right back. Hatton had NOTHING. Didn't even have the advantage in strength.

Anyway the reason why PAC beat De La Hoya is purely because of SPEED. Hatton doesn't possess anything that would have troubled La Hoya.

ANSWER: GIVE PAC HIS CREDIT FOR BEATING DLH.