Would have Roy Jones Jr. defeated these opponents if he fought them during his prime?

First off he did defeat Tarver while past his own prime. In 90s jones wins a wide decision over tarver

the rest he would mop the floor with.

 

With or without PEDs? Question requires more context.

 

Yes but Tarver always poses a threat to RJJ due to his Southpaw style and KO power in his left hand.

I don't think RJJ looked that bad in the 2nd meeting vs Tarver he certainly looked better compared to their 1st meeting. It was just Tarver caught RJJ with a perfectly timed shot and that seemed to pretty much destroy RJJ's confidence.

So whilst I would pick a prime RJJ to beat Tarver more often than not I still think Tarver always poses a stylistic issue for RJJ and theres always a chance Tarver could KO RJJ.

RJJ at Super Middleweight is close to unbeatable but at Light Heavyweight I favour quite a few Light Heavyweights to KO him out.

 

I agree. The fight was close but Jones edged it.

 

No question at all for me he wins all those fights. Hell, he beat Tarver already.

 

There are few fights I would like to watch more than RJJ Vs. John Calzaghe; prime Vs. prime.

 

Jones would have went undefeated through all of them.

 

Roy beats 'em all in his prime.

 

Jones Jr. Beats all of them.
A few quite easily....

 

He beats all of them, no question in my mind.
He looked dreadful - and old - against the likes of Macarinelli , Green etc. So I think those are fairly easy to say.
Probably, in fairness, the only ones to make an argument for would be Tarver and Calzaghe. But he DID beat Tarver anyway, when he was in decline. And I think a younger Jones would be too much for Calzaghe, IMO.
So, yes, I feel very confident in saying Jones wins all these fights. Tarver is Probably the most difficult, stylistically. But I still think a Jones anywhere near his best wins a relatively comfortable decision.

 

All .