Would Haye's odds be shorter or longer if they were to rematch in England?

Longer I think.He was beaten in pretty much every round.Wlad showed he can cope with all Haye brings to the table.Haye can only fight the way he did last night so Wlad would come in a huge fave at the bookies.
Would I back Haye at the improved odds?Possibly,he will be well pissed off with what happened in that fight and from a betting point of view a guy like that coming out with nothing to lose this time would be at least worth some thought when placing a bet especially if its in front of his home fans.

 

Why rematch? Everyone who wasn't a Brittard knew he was out of his league. Why bother? :?

 

Wlad has been beating contenders for the last seven years. It's about time the ******s on here realised that.

 

Why not a rematch?Who else is there out there?Haye got beaten but he kept Wlad busy most of the fight.Although he did not win more than 2 rounds in my opinion he had Wlad`s full attention at all times.Wlad had to work hard for this one it was not just walk forward easily winning rounds,he worked for the win.
I aint saying Haye would win a return but at least he brings the fighter out in Wlad.Id rather see a Haye rematch than a Tony Thompson one.

 

Just like Khan should rematch McCloskey.

Wlad would show he's a superior boxer every time. Bring it on I say, I won't lie, I loved seeing Haye humiliated tonight.

 

Excellent point. I've no rebuttal to that. You win. :-(

 

Emotion aside, he wasn't *humiliated* though was he? Humiliated would be getting swept aside in 3 rounds. This to me was just a brutal underlining of 1. how **** heavyweight is and 2. how unbeatable the Klitschko's are among the current crop.

 

Cant say I was not happy to see him look a fool either.The division is so weak though that a Haye rematch would not be a bad option for Wlad.No way its ppv in the UK though.
As for Khan v McCloskey 2,no thanks,**** that.

 

He made the same effort every other contender did. Which was scoffed at by the entire forum. "They weren't there to win" Haye was no different. I never scoffed at their efforts, I simply conceded that they were in with a drastically superior fighter, just like Haye. It's the Brits here that need some humility, not me.

 

He was in the fight until the end, and Wladimir knew it, which is more than you can say about pretty much anyone in the last 5 or so years. I'm not gonna say it was a good performance or a good fight, because it wasn't, but he hasn't been immediately turned into a laughing stock after it.

 

I never said he was. He did his best, just like all the other contenders did. He came up against a better man, simple as. Thing is all the other contenders were a laughing stock to the Brit forum, but it doesn't apply to Haye for some mad reason, I wonder why. :think

 

You said you "loved seeing Haye humiliated tonight", which kind of implies that there was some big hilarious ownage or whatever, when in reality it was a **** fight with a predictable and unsatisfactory conclusion. And it's not like the 'Brit Forum' were on their own in rubbishing the Klitschko's opponents. Being as Haye did better than anyone as of late I guess the 'Brit Forum' were right.