I don't think it would. Both of these guys are known to not only fight dirty, but their personalities mesh in a way that I think just about guarantees such a hypothetical match would end early due to some kind of disqualification. Bowes resilience was enough to drive Golata insane and caused him to resort to low blows more than usual from what I know. Holyfield on the other hand is the exact type of guy known for resilience and aggravating his opponents with his roughhousing tactics (low blows, headbutts, etc.). Did you see the sheer rage in Tysons eyes after the fight got cancelled? He wanted to rip Holyfield a new one. I could only imagine how ticked Golata would be and he had less control over his anger than Tyson did. I think the strongest possibilities are it ends in a brawl or disqualification on Golata's end for excessive low blowing.
Good post and good analysis. Holyfield would be exactly the sort of guy to press all of Golota's red buttons and once Golota put one in Holy's nutsack in return for a headbutt, the firework festivities would kick off. I actually fancy Holy on a DQ win because his headbutts were a lot more artful and harder to spot than Golota's outright 3 body punches + 1 nut punch combos.
Now Swag sorry to quote but I just think you are wrong. Holyfield has never been disqualified in his career, but he is partially responsible for having others disqualified in fights against him. Even in the fight with Rahman, he won by technical decision. On the other hand, Golota was disqualified less times than he should have been in his career. Biting his neck, like a vampire, against Samson Po'uha, and walking out of the ring between rounds against Tyson should also have been disqualifications. So I don't think there is a possibility of double disqualification here. Holyfield could "force" Golota to disqualify in two ways: 1a.) dirty punches (even with the head, which the referee would not see) 2b.) regular punches like Tyson and Samson Or better said:
Holyfield was much much more mentally tough and a much much better cheater. Holyfield would win by some kind of stoppage or by disqualification.
Golota had some talent and boxing ability, but he was a very mentally weak. I actually don't think it was all his fault, though. I know that boxing is full of mentally questionable and damaged characters. But I think Golota was actually legitimately mentally ill and shouldn't have been anywhere near a boxing ring. A lot of fighters like Andre Ward have shared similar opinions on him. Whatever you think about Holyfield's dirtiness and almost certain PED use, the guy was one of the mentally strongest heavyweights that's ever fought in a boxing ring. He was incredibly physically durable and he had a nearly unbreakable will in nearly every contest he fought. He also had ridiculous cardio for most of his career and had an unbelievable output and pace for heavyweights. I have no doubt in my mind that Golota would have broke under that avalanche of physical and mental pressure.
Holyfield is alot smarter with his fouling, so Holyfield would out smart Golota and force him into breaking down getting himself DQed. On paper though style wise apart from the fouling I think it would be an entertaining fight.
I imagine both guys would be warned throughout the fight for their conduct and perhaps even have some points deducted. But I believe it also could make it to the cards unless a stoppage or KO occurs at some point. Probably not a bad fight if truth be told
Golata think’s Holyfield’s ball bags are speed bags. And Holyfield thinks Golata’s head is Rahman’s head. Messy ugly affair. But it’d be easier to disqualify Golata.