would kessler beat pavlik convincingly?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hopkins54, Jun 8, 2008.


  1. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  2. madpup

    madpup Active Member Full Member

    1,061
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Lockett was WBO mandatory challenger, so Pavlik had to fight him eventually or lose his belt. Manfredo was not a mandatory.
     
  3. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Not singleing you out here, but the more any of us mention nationality, etc, the worse this crap gets. Granted, we will root for the locals, but how many people in the UK seriously picked Lockett over Pavlik. We don't HAVE to make this ALL about nationality, etc.... I think if we can't make our point about boxing WITHOUT, then we can't make our point at all. ;)
     
  4. Shaolin Box

    Shaolin Box Respect Full Member

    4,030
    3
    Nov 30, 2007
    Pavlik owns Kessler..
     
  5. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    See, your poll options says all that needs to be said. Had you not been a nationalistic **** sucker, and tried to be fair (and what seems to be the obvious) with the way you wanted to put it would've been: Yes, Im UK and NO, I'm a Yank. All these polls are is a friggin roll count for which country has more people logged in at the time, about 99%.
     
  6. billyconn

    billyconn Active Member Full Member

    1,296
    0
    Oct 6, 2007
    I didn't think you were saying that. :good

    Good job cutting to the chase :yep .....at least with the A-B-C there is some point of reference.
     
  7. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    By a guy with a bad back that will fight, at most, twice a year because the back hampers his training? You been drinking the kool-aid......
     
  8. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Well, since Pav's next fight might well be Calzaghe, would that be good enough?
     
  9. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    i hope Pavlik fight Calzaghe and Kessler
     
  10. nickfoxx

    nickfoxx On The Nod Full Member

    3,211
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    actually, i think no american wants to see this fight because our attitude toward kessler can be summed up by bernard: "KESSLER?!? WHO IS KESSLER?!?"

    just another protected and robotic european fighter with no real credibility nor championship credentials
     
  11. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I've watche Pavlik/Talyor 2 and Kessler/Calzaghe back to back a couple of times. Taylor is faster. No way around it.
     
  12. Rubberduck

    Rubberduck Active Member Full Member

    556
    0
    May 8, 2007
    Kessler and Pavlik are pretty similar in styles, as mentioned earlier in the thread. Howewer Kessler is the better counterpuncher, and I believe that will give him the edge when Pavlik tries too hard to be the agressor in the fight.
    I firmly beleive that Kessler learnt from his loss, and has improved his arsenal after analyzing the Calzaghe fight. His uppercuts hurt Calzaghe and Montoya is working with his body punches ( See his sparring vid).
    His punces are crisper, and against types like Pavlik he is too quick and evasive.
    I see it a UD for Kessler.
     
  13. KilltheKing

    KilltheKing Overthrower Full Member

    895
    0
    Apr 1, 2008

    Which is also why Joe C was never up for a fight with the best over here ... they had never heard of him ... his reputation was as large as a small duck pond ... fortunately .. for Joe
     
  14. Paulie

    Paulie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,049
    0
    Oct 15, 2007
    50/50 fight...