would kessler beat pavlik convincingly?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hopkins54, Jun 8, 2008.


  1. Serpent Saint

    Serpent Saint Member Full Member

    302
    0
    May 16, 2008
    You have been ducking this for hours now.

    Again, if this is such an easy fight for Pavlik, why has he not been calling out Calzaghe at every available opportunity?

    cue more lame "Pavlik is too much of a gentleman to stoop to that level" bull****.

    The truth is, if/when the fight is signed, you will soil yourself.
     
  2. Serpent Saint

    Serpent Saint Member Full Member

    302
    0
    May 16, 2008
    :rofl
     
  3. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    What is so comical?
     
  4. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    This guy earned the distinction of being the first person on my ignore list. Please don't quote him and get him through my filter. Just not up to people feeding trolls today.:D
     
  5. Serpent Saint

    Serpent Saint Member Full Member

    302
    0
    May 16, 2008
    Pavlik showed improvement last night?

    In what way? How did he improve?
     
  6. DaHead242

    DaHead242 Active Member Full Member

    1,470
    0
    Aug 28, 2004
    i'd love to hear you reasoning for why Pavlik beats both Kessler and Calzaghe besides the whole fighter A beat fighter B logic. because we all know that kind of logic is worth jack ****.
     
  7. Serpent Saint

    Serpent Saint Member Full Member

    302
    0
    May 16, 2008
    I guess the smilie he quoted was very offensive. :lol:

    You are a proven liar, a cheat, a scumbag, an ******* who makes up quotes in order to further his own pathetic agenda, and basically, you are not very intelligent. You were clowned in your own idiotic thread.

    In short, you are absolutely clueless.

    It would break my heart if someone quoted this.
     
  8. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    2 things.. I thought his handspeed looked quicker last night than I've seen in his previous bouts, and he also showed more variety in his offensive arsenal than what he showed against guys like Zertuche and Taylor when he decided to box from long range. He uses great offensive variety when he's just attacking and brawling, but he hasn't shown it much when he's using his range behind a good jab. Last night was the first time I've seen him use both great variety and a good long jab.

    It was a good display of skills on the part of Pavlik I thought. I like what I saw and I hope to see more improvements from Kelly in the future. Remember, he's still very young and he's yet to really hit his absolute prime.
     
  9. DaHead242

    DaHead242 Active Member Full Member

    1,470
    0
    Aug 28, 2004
    :D
     
  10. Serpent Saint

    Serpent Saint Member Full Member

    302
    0
    May 16, 2008
    Dude, he was fighting Gary Lockett.

    Pavlik looked exactly how he always looks. I am not criticising him here, he did precisely what he had to do. But let's not make it out to be more than it was.
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Cut this bull**** out man. From reading what you've said you're either taking a **** or you didn't even see the fight. We already have enough Amsterdam wannabe's...we don't need more.
     
  12. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    And? Just because you're fighting a lesser opponent than you doens't mean that you can't show things in there that you've never shown before. I'm not praising Pavlik as the next coming of Ray Robinson here, I'm simply saying he looked great last night. Geez.
     
  13. hopkins54

    hopkins54 Active Member Full Member

    776
    0
    Feb 13, 2008
    he was fighting a very limited fighter, anyone would look like ray robinson fighting the likes of gary ****ing locket.
     
  14. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    See you cats from the UK started off the year by saying stupid sh*t like. Kessler and Calzaghe are two or three levels above Pavlik and Taylor...Now what was that based on??? I know that fighter A beatting fighter b and B beating C dont mean that A would beat C...But I think that its more proof then you cats saying that Calzaghe and Kessler are levels about Pavlik and Taylor based on you living closer to them. At least I have logic and you just pulling stuff out of your backside.
     
  15. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Who is the fuk is Kessler fighting??? In fact who in the fuk has Kessler ever fought???