Would modern Deontay Wilder be too small for the 80s/90s HW divison?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Jul 21, 2018.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Obviously he was carrying 8-10 lb extra. They weighed him on the scales.
    But you said it was 10lb of flab. That's the contention.

    Um, yes.

    Great. So what, we're arguing semantics over "fit," and "ripped?"
    Lol, it's cool, you can take it. It has no meaning to my point.

    Awesome, then what are we arguing about?

    As in they aren't inherently the same size?
    Guess what, there's no argument there either.
    What are we doing here?
     
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    It's the same enough, where if there was a 216lb weight class, they could fight each other.
    And considering they both fought capably at that weight, it would be similar enough to say the least.

    It doesn't.
    You can add weight without adding extra flab.

    Look at Holyfield for his first Bowe fight:
    http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2013/0821/box_holyfield_bowe_02b.jpg

    Where is the flab?
     
  3. Mr Icaman

    Mr Icaman 32-0 WBC Champ, Ring + Lineal HW Champ Full Member

    4,451
    3,429
    Aug 31, 2015
    Wilder is a SHW don't let what he comes in on the scales fool you.. He is extremely lean and his frame could easily handle and extra 20 pounds of muscle.

    He is undersized in his limbs not his core and shoulders where it matters... One of the reasons why he is successful is because of his unique body make up..

    90% of those so called SWH's are only carrying extra fat anyway and if they got down to Wilder level of body fat they too would be weighing 200 odd pounds..
     
    Combatesdeboxeo_ likes this.
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,496
    87,461
    Aug 21, 2012
    OK then. What ARE you saying?

    OK then. What ARE you saying?

    What IS my agenda?

    You're the one with dozens of posts on the subject (said subject that you won't actually come out and identify, but play coy with) arguing with me, contro, and everybody who has 2c to say on it. I'd say that you're the emotional one who needs a big mug of chamomile (and probably a valium to go with it) in order to calm down.
     
  5. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Copied and pasted:

    "Doesn’t change the point im trying to make here. Which is that Louis fought capably at a weight identical to Wilders when Deontay dethroned King Kong Ortiz."

    Big modern HWs > Past HWs

    Yeah ok kid. You weren't the one who went all reeee in the thread. Sure man.
     
  6. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,496
    87,461
    Aug 21, 2012
    OK, and so what about it?

    Big skilled HW's > smaller skilled HW's. I'll go with that.

    :lol: Sometimes I wonder how people have views that are 180' from reality and still maintain that they're not
     
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Well BCS8, this is a boxing forum, where people share knowledge and debate arguments.
    That was one of them. You uhh...ok?

    Yeah, that's the agenda you're getting paranoid and defensive over.

    We can't wait to hear what you've come up with. (yawn)
     
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,496
    87,461
    Aug 21, 2012
    In other news, I think Marvin Hagler was really good! Have you heard of him?? You should find some of his fights on youtube!!!!

    I think it's fairly obvious size matters. But you're welcome to your alternate universe theories.

    I met this crazy guy online that doesn't seem to think size matters in boxing. He's loopy but you may have something in common?
     
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    You're melting again.
    What does that have to do with this thread?
    Maybe start a Hagler thread.

    Are you protesting that the contents in a thread should relate to the topic of the title?
    You good?

    Have you ever presented an argument that wasn't a strawman?

    Cool story man.
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,496
    87,461
    Aug 21, 2012
    Now you're complaining about good solid boxing info. There's no pleasing some folks.

    Yes, here's one: size matters in boxing.

    My pleasure.
     
  11. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Letting us know that Marvin Hagler videos exist on youtube = good boxing info?
    Profound. Enlightening. You should start a blog.

    Well done.
    I agree that size matters in boxing.
    And there goes your strawman.
     
  12. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,496
    87,461
    Aug 21, 2012
    Nah it's OK, I don't mind providing my knowledge straight to the folks that need it most.

    :) My work here is done.
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    Is it possible that you're teaching me that Hagler videos exist on Youtube, when I myself have created a video on Marvin Hagler on youtube?

    https://www.tuxboard.com/photos/2017/02/Kayode-Ewumi-meme-1050x607.jpg

    I'm sure being corrected is work for you.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,696
    30,598
    Jun 2, 2006
    Wilder is big enough for anyone ,the question is ,is he good enough? He doesn't seem to have made the improvement one would have expected after 40 fights but gets by on his "get out of jail power".Of course, by and large he is fighting second and third string guys which will prolong his shelf life but what is he learning?
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  15. sauhund II

    sauhund II Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,523
    2,239
    Nov 8, 2008
    IMO, still enough to KO the Bodybuilder, I guess when they eventually fight we find out who is right or wrong.