Would past fighters be considered journeymen under today's boxing standards?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eastpaw, Jun 22, 2015.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,155
    Feb 11, 2005
    The Spanish David Price?


    Yeah, worldbeaters. If offense was not included in factoring wins, Bugner would have been a great.
    A 100 year old Liston who fought one fight in the decade surely deserves a mention.

    I guess if you can beat Terry Daniels, you are amazing.

    His best heavyweight scalp in the 70's was a sub-500 Roy Wallace. Lionel Butler had beter wins.

    Fought 3 times in the 70's and retired.

    Beat absolutely no one of note in the 70's.

    That whittles down your Magic 20... and I was being kind.

    My point being... The heavyweight division is almost always shallow on elite talent... even in the Golden Era's, such few as there are, it dissipates quickly.
     
  2. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    Do you realize I was responding to a list that included ****ey in the same era as Liston and Patterson? If we're playing by those rules, everyone I listed was relevant in the 90s so it's completely valid.
     
  3. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    He also named Patterson. He also named ****ey. You don't have to be in your peak to be relevant in an era. Everyone I named put in work during the 90s.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    You didn't actually have a point ,you've made the same, or very similar post a couple of times now and each time it has had no relevance to the threads. They were all rated in the 70's .
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    ****ey was rated in the 70's so was Liston.
     
  6. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    And everyone I included was rated in the 90s.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    I never commented on your post:huh
     
  8. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    Well, everyone was jumping on my 90s list for doing it the same way as your list.
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    its complete speculation that the new timers would adapt to the abilities of th old timers too.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,155
    Feb 11, 2005
    No, it has every bit of relevance in proving that guys who were journeyman level were rated in the greatest of eras. Is that so hard to comprehend?
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Oh you are giving me lessons in comprehension now? F*ck me ,why don't you include a couple of unnecessarily long adjectives like you usually do to illustrate your erudition?
    P*ss off pr*ck!
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,110
    25,266
    Jan 3, 2007
    True.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,110
    25,266
    Jan 3, 2007
    Doubtful.. He lost to Leotis Martin in 1969 and died in 1970.
     
  14. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,724
    4,461
    Jul 14, 2009
    Agreed
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,155
    Feb 11, 2005
    I still want to grab a drink with you.