would ricky hatton have beat floyd if it wasnt 4 the referee?

Another one? This has been done a million times. Simple answer = NO.

For YOUR sake, I really do hope your trolling... With Scotland in your name, though, I'm assuming your British... And you never know with you lot and your fighters!

It's damn threads and thought processes like these that will lead to Hatton-Floyd 2 in England over Floyd-Cotto :-(

 

HELL NO!

when will hatton fans learn hatton is not any good at welter, anyone in the top 15 at welterweight would have hattons ass.

 

:rofl :rofl

you dont know **** about boxing!

 

Thats why Hatton ducked him twice at light welter then.

 

Oh dear, your being serious.

:scaredas:

 

Mayweather TKO 10

 

Here we go again, people are stil crying over this lost.
No it doesnt matter if Ramshall was the ref:yep, Hatton woulda still lost

 

Nope. This thread is bogus!

 

Oh good, another one of these threads. To answer your question: NO

 

he'd beat him at a beer drinking contest

 

Seeing as he was dominating Floyd throughout the 10 rounds, and scoring lots of meaningful shots before the ref got involved and changed the course of the action I would say that he could have stopped Floyd in rounds 4-6

 

I wouldn't give Rick a 50/50 chance if the 3rd man was James Bond.

So to answer: No.

 

Yes, of course dear :nut1 :nut2 :nut3 :nut4 :nut5 :nut6 :nut7 :nut8:nut 9 :nut 10 - over and out.

Now go play on the highway:!: .

Trolling is fine by me. This unfortunately doesnt even qualify as trolling - What is the proper term for the level below?