Would the average boxer today win a round v the best boxer 50 years ago?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jun 9, 2019.



  1. mark ant

    mark ant Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,966
    3,333
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 4, 2017
    Someone asked a stupid question on Quora asking would the average fighter today beat the best boxer from 50 years ago, and it got me thinking, would it be a shutout for the P4P top guy in 1969, what do fans think and who was the best fighter in 1969?
     
    POTUS and eltirado like this.
  2. CST80

    CST80 The Mercurial Malcontent Staff Member

    141,880
    53,856
    Sportsbook:
    28,000
    Nov 23, 2013
    Which division, it needs to be more specific.:deal:

    The best in each one of them? The best in a few? Or the best overall? Which limits it to just guys in and around that particular division.
     
    Alo2006, BCS8, eltirado and 3 others like this.
  3. Saintpat

    Saintpat Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,939
    2,259
    Sportsbook:
    1,158
    Jun 26, 2009
    Figure that Ali guy would win some rounds at heavy.
     
    Dannymita, mark ant, BCS8 and 4 others like this.
  4. jhar26

    jhar26 Member Full Member

    234
    58
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 23, 2004
    He would probably beat all the average ones and some of the very good ones. But of course we have to take into account that todays heavyweights fight in truth in the equivalent of a weight division above Ali. Guys like Jack Dempsey, Floyd Patterson or Joe Frazier were almost tiny compared to the likes of a Wlad, Fury or Joshua.
     
  5. FinitoxDinamita

    FinitoxDinamita New Member Full Member

    89
    70
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 14, 2019
    Not only would the modern fighter win rounds, but he would destroy these primitive fighters.
     
  6. ecto55

    ecto55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,691
    262
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 28, 2009
    No - there’s always been larger heavyweights with quick hands...eg. Buster Mathis Sr.

    250lb heavyweights are not a new phenomenon- it’s just that in the days of 15 round championship fights they often gassed in the latter rounds or faltered in the championship rounds (rd’s 12-15).
     
  7. Charlie Stewart

    Charlie Stewart Member Full Member

    111
    99
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 5, 2019
    prob not
    boxing is a sport for d level athletes at best these days
     
  8. Lesion of Doom

    Lesion of Doom Active Member Full Member

    510
    469
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 21, 2015
    Today's fighters would by and large slaughter them, other than a handful in certain divisions.
     
    Oakland Billy Smith likes this.
  9. RealDeal

    RealDeal Active Member Full Member

    571
    412
    Sportsbook:
    1,637
    May 2, 2009
    Here are your heavyweights in 1969:

    This content is protected
    , Champion

    1. This content is protected
    2. This content is protected
    3. This content is protected
    4. This content is protected
    5. This content is protected
    6. This content is protected
    7. This content is protected
    8. This content is protected
    9. This content is protected
    10. This content is protected
      el Peralta
    I’m not exactly sure how you’d define “average” but perhaps choose someone like Bryant Jennings. And then ask yourself how the Bryant Jennings of 2019 would do against the 1969 version of Frazier or Ali.
     
    POTUS, ForemanJab, mark ant and 4 others like this.
  10. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    61,466
    6,498
    Sportsbook:
    62
    Jul 26, 2004
    Mathis would be considered small today. Not a great example of a 'large heavyweight.'
     
    eltirado likes this.
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    8,891
    3,168
    Sportsbook:
    1,605
    Apr 3, 2012
    Smart dumb guy comment. Buster Mathis was a talented am who was nothing special as a pro and wouldn't be anything special after the 70s.

    The big guys at the top of division are the stand outs from a sea of mostly mediocre big guys. That trend mostly is from the 80s onward.
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    8,891
    3,168
    Sportsbook:
    1,605
    Apr 3, 2012
    Henry Cooper is on those ratings and somehow did floor Ali though.
     
  13. jhar26

    jhar26 Member Full Member

    234
    58
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 23, 2004
    If there had been an internet in the 1960's fans would have posted after that fight, "Ali has a chin of glass! He's been exposed!" ;)
     
    Rilz, Keleneki, the_Hawk and 3 others like this.
  14. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    7,979
    232
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Sep 2, 2009
    I’ve been following boxing for decades, and I’ve never quite understood how those guys from the 60s and before were able to do what they did. I believe SRR fought Bull twice within a three week span.

    Regarding the subject, I’ve also never understood why so ppl think old fighters were better. People who say this can never explain exactly what was lost.
     
  15. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Youngest Ezzard Charles Fan Ever Full Member

    3,050
    2,439
    Sportsbook:
    1,022
    Mar 3, 2019
    Depends on at which weight, if you did it at LHW for example, a guy like Anthony Yarde wouldn't make a round with Bob Foster let alone win one
     
    POTUS, Glass Joe, DJN16 and 5 others like this.

Share This Page