Would the Klitchko's still "RUN" the HW division if they fought from 1983-93?

****ing joke of a post, Darryl your almost as stupid as your avatar.

1. TYSON DISMEMBER'S BOTH OF THESE *****'S AND MAKES THEM CONSIDER ANOTHER PROFESSION!
2. Neither could KO Holmes, Vitali wins on points, Vlad is a toss up, Old Larry could get sympathy rounds.
3. Holyfied KO's Vlad, Vitali is a decision toss up.
4. Big Daddy Bowe Ko's Vlad, and wins a decision against Vitali.
5. and why is everyone forgetting Ruddock??? he has a chance against either Vlads, but Vitali probably KO's him.
6. The Klits are prospering from a weak division, they are ATG's only in this era.

 

WOW! If Spinks could tame a prime Holmes , he definately could tame the Klits. People are only thinking of the Tyson Spinks. Thats like only thinking of the Golota Bowe and forgetting how great they really were.

 

He fought Holmes in 86, not really prime in my opinion.
Spinks barely made the 200 lb. limit, he would be at a huge size and strength disadvantage against the Klitschkos, he would be cannon fodder. I'm not forgetting how great he was, at LHW, at HW he gets destroyed by Wlad or Vitali.

 

yes darryl we know it is your opinion and we would advise you to keep it to yourself just like that rash you gave my daughters pony! 'spinks and cooney' lol the klits would slap em both silly with there dicks!

 

actually 1985, Holmes was 48-0, he had slid a little, but he was still better than the Klits.:hat

 

Yeah, they fought in 86 as well, and Holmes was a bit of a slob by that point and I don't think he was better than the Klitschkos then, and Spinks still wouldn't have a chance against either of them.:smoke

 

Wlad doesn't knock anyone out quickly.

A prime Ruddock had a pretty good chin and WAY more power than Sanders or Brewster.

Wlad would be eating a lot of canvas.


Keith

 

Vitali? Nah, Tyson UD, but don't be surprised by Vitali late tko/ko (Though an outside chance).

 

Vitali or Vlad would knock Holmes out.

 

It's hard to say. So far the Klits have been fighting guys without much of plan in the ring. The fighters are either scared or for whatever reason unwilling to take chances.

 

McCall would have a good chance, purely because of his chin. Though he could be outboxed.

Would have a good chance if he dragged Wlad into a fight at any stage.

As somebody else said, the problem with most of those fighters named is that at their best, they could be truly world class. But it was just as likely they could turn up and be very average. Far too inconsistent to confidently pick anything going their way.

One a good night, most of them are a good chance. On a bad one, they'd get brutalised, as if nothing else, the brothers are very consistent.

 

exactly. close thread.

 

Very outside chance, he couldn't keep Tyson off him, Tyson is better in speed , offense , defense, footwork, He KO's both Klits 99/100 times

 

were forgetting the comeback Foreman, he is a nightmare for both Klits, they can't knock him out, but he can definately knock both of them out repeatedly!

 

Looking back at those 80s boxers and I was say the klitschkos would destroy most of them. Holyfield would have given them a challenge. But Tyson was the best of all time in the late 80s. If the golfer could ko wlad so could tyson. But height wouldnt matter with prime tyson because of the speed and power.