Would the Soviet sports machine have taken over boxing had they allowed their Boxers to turn pro?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MixedMartialLaw, Jun 10, 2025.


  1. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,729
    4,161
    Jan 6, 2024
    No. But they'd have been the 2nd most successful country.

    If the Soviet Union continued existing post 1991 its combined member states would have made it the most successful boxing nation at some point around the turn of the century.
     
  2. Lonsdale81

    Lonsdale81 Member Full Member

    415
    615
    May 19, 2025
    Soviet boxers undoubtedly had the raw potential to reshape pro boxing. Technically brilliant fighters with a steel like mindset, barring the odd vodka or two.. Their amateur dominance showed they could produce assembly line talent.. & in a less biased system they might’ve come closer to domination.. but the American market’s grip.. promoters, networks, judges favoring homegrown or more marketable western stars would’ve been a massive hurdle for them.. Recent examples of questionable scoring underline this.
     
    MixedMartialLaw likes this.
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,032
    Jun 30, 2005
    You see other striking sports that play a lot with distance bouncing; karate and taekwondo. Or at least you used to, I don't know what modern TKD looks like.
     
    themaster458 likes this.
  4. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,493
    12,940
    Feb 2, 2006
    I think they would have turned up some very good boxers and maybe some champions but remember Leonard,Hagler, Duran, Arguello, Benitez and Hearns were around and I don't care if they were from Mars they didn't have that level of talent.