Would the Tyson that beat Berbick, beat Joshua that beat Martin

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by smallsteps, Apr 11, 2016.


  1. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Before breaking into tears and trying to find where all your teeth have gone.
     
  2. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    I'd knock you as far back as your mother's rent book.......
     
  3. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    :lol:

    Dont hurt me now.
     
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Don't worry I'd go gentle on you, I've heard you can't take it rough.
     
  5. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Is that what your hero was doing on his knees in Tokyo.....
     
  6. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    While your hero was sitting on his ass :lol:
     
  7. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Speaking of moms,

    tell yours to stop changing her lipstick so often, my **** is beginning to look like a rainbow ;)
     
  8. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    She told me she only could fit red and blue on your bookies pencil.....
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Fury's #1.
    Wlad's #2.
    Ortiz is probably #3, though the winner of Povetkin-Wilder might deserve to be rated #3 yet.

    Joshua can't beat Fury, Wlad or Ortiz as of now.
    IF he ever does, I will give him his due credit.

    I think Joshua is pretty good and would stand a good chance against Povetkin, and from what I've seen he's possibly way superior to Wilder.
    I don't have any results to base that on, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.