have beaten either Klitschko in the same fashion as he did Ruddock or would it be a worse beating? Or would he still lose to one or both of them?
That version of Tyson would stop Wlad within 3 rounds. Tyson would connect and be all over Wlad who would get destroyed like against Corrie Sanders. Vitali is a tougher prospect. He takes a good shot. He can fight a dogfight. It might be like Tyson - Ruddock 2 with Tyson winning a close decision.
Tyson would destroy the Brothers prime based purely on his head movement, the jab is good and well but they don't have someone practically running at them bobbing weaving and throwing punches they would get nightmares from, I know Vitali is solid in terms of his chin but if Corrie Sanders can make him retreat in the chicken fashion Mike Tyson would finish him inside 6, I know I might sound like a Tyson fanboy but lets be honest the Klitschko's have never faced an opponent who comes at them like Tyson with that speed and power, there obvious weakness is an opponent that starts fast prime Tyson only knows how to run through you
Tyson of Ruddock I would have killed the guy in your avatar inside three rounds and it wouldn't have been a cool killing. Wladimir would have been running around the ring, ala Corey Sanders, prior to having his lights put out. Let's not even talk about '88 Tyson.
It's just a pity that tyson did nothing to back your words up. I might be more inclined to believe it if he beat anyone half decent.
To be fair. You could say the same about the Klitschko's. What's Vitali's best win, Peter, Sanders, Hide? Wlad's best win is probably Byrd. So it's not like their resume's are any better than Tyson's.
...And Tyson would have most likely ended the likes of Chambers. Peter, Thompson, Ibragimov, and Rahman inside 2-3 rounds each.