Would the Tyson who beat Ruddock both times

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RingKing, Oct 23, 2010.


  1. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,018
    624
    Feb 21, 2008
    The only comparison I was making with Ruddock and the Klits were that he was taller and heavier than Tyson although not as tall nor as heavy as the Klits. That being said, IMO, Ruddock was more fluid in the ring with his feet and his punches than either Klits. He also had faster hands, IMO.

    Vitali from what I have seen likes to come forward in a careful manner with a poking jab and then a right cross. He doesn't have a lot of head movement and he is almost stiff legged inside the squared circle. His size actually might have worked against him against Tyson who was an exceptional inside fighter for a heavyweight. Could Vitali have taken those bodyshots that Ruddock did? Those were some very devastating shots. I think Tyson would have had more trouble with Vitali than with Wladimir, whose shaky chin would have been big trouble against the power punching Tyson.

    Don't get me wrong, the Klits are the best heavyweights of the last 5-10 years, and have been pretty much dominant against all comers or at least Vitali has. Wladimir has had more trouble, but he still has held his own.
     
  2. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    The Tyson of the Ruddock fights would be made for either brother unforunately. At this stage of his career, he quit doing the things that would have helped him solve their proficient long range boxing. He has a puncher's chance but woud likely be controlled and take an ugly beating in decision loses. Sorry. No head movement, one punch head hunting, and of course vunerable to the clinch. Loading up with uppercuts and forgetting to jab, Ruddock couldn't take advantage of these short comings. Wlad would jab and hold Iron Mike to death, and Vitali would find him all night with 1-2s.

    Mike wasn't very sharp against Ruddock, outside of his ability to take punishment and win a long hard fight, I have no idea why those performances have become so mythic. Tyson fought dumb and executed poorly against a limited opponent.


    [url]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1139727/index.htm[/url]

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    This content is protected




    This content is protected


    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
     
  3. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,018
    624
    Feb 21, 2008
     
  4. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    Man Wlad has no chance vs Tyson, none at all. Vitali I will hear you out, although I think Tyson beats him, but Wlad has no chance with that glass baby and panick attacks he has, none.
     
  5. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    HE WOULD KNOCK BOTH OF THEM OUT/TYSON WAS A BADAASSS............................I SPOKE TO TERRY NORRIS ABOUT THIS AND HE SAID KLIT BROS WOULD GET THIER ASSES SPANKED:smoke
     
  6. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007

    WHAT THIS GUY SAID:good
     
  7. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007

    I BET U WOULD LUV TO SMELL WLADS SWEATY BALLS U FUKIN **** SNIFFER:smoke
     
  8. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007

    tyson was 19 when he beat tillis..............imagine if tyson fought tillis in 88...........
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Tyson would quit before he is brutally KOd
     
  10. EverLast

    EverLast Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,175
    6
    Oct 20, 2009
    stopped reading this bull**** after the first paragraph

    an essay is what it will take to convince anyone with acumen regarding the history of boxing, that any klitschko would beat tyson.

    i dont think the ruddock tyson was the same man from 1986 to 1989, purely because of self abuse, but he still kicks the **** out of Wlad, and UD's vitali.
     
  11. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Tyson was a mental midget. Every time he met any kind of resistance he self-destructed. Vitali would give him a beating of his life.
     
  12. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Ruddock was trying to fight Tyson on the inside. This should put to rest the discussion about his boxing smarts.
     
  13. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Tyson stops Wlad, he takes Vitali to hell. The best of Tyson and the best from Vitali I'd say Tyson by a close margin.
     
  14. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    I am a big Wlad fan, but i agree tyson would knock him out.

    I think Vitali would beat tyosn. people saying tyson would UD vitali? really? vitali has lost very few rds as a pro, you just arent going to beat him on the cards.

    Vitali UD or TKO late tyson

    Tyson KO wlad rd 2
     
  15. the 88 Tyson was betetr than the 91 Tyson who beat Ruddock..

    How can you compare Ruddock to the klit Bros?? that would be like comparing Eva Longoria to Susan Boyle, Ruddock was never that good...
    Tyson of 88 against Wlad of today would be a 50-50 fight, if the fight went more than 6 rounds Tyson would lose he never had good stamina..

    Vitali has a chin of iron he would take those shots and keep coming, Tyson was never good against tall fighters VK would win a decision...