Would These Diehards put Money on Ward-Froch II in London?

What have you seen to think any SMW stops Froch mate?
He's never been close to being stopped.Even Taylor is a bit of a myth.

 

froch was beat the **** up
wasnt even close.
they could fight on a hot air balloon and ward still kicks the **** out of him. get over it boys

 

Save your typing finger mate.
If you have a read through most of his posts you'll see a recurring theme.
Apparently Ward is a monster since he stopped a skeleton that looked like Chad Dawson.
As you, me and anybody that actually watched the Taylor fight knows, Froch suffered a flash knockdown in the third round,he was clear headed, looked at his corner,took the count and got up. By the turn Froch was starting to time and counter Taylor, and he was landing big shots at will (even the American commentary team noted this). By the 10th round it was obvious that Taylor was on borrowed time, he was doing nothing except throwing the odd flurry and eating Frochs right hand.
Getting back to the original question....
Ward has a style that Froch doesn't have an answer to, that doesn't make Froch a poor fighter, it simply means he has the style/tools to beat the rest but not Ward.I've always said that Ward has Frochs number, and that Froch may find a way to make a rematch closer on the cards, but i'd still pick Ward to beat him.
As for a rematch in the UK, i'd bet my house that never happens.Froch is simply the cash cow that Ward covets, and Ward knows he needs Froch and/or Kessler to generate the dollars.

 

:rofl I'm glad somebody else saw that fight what an apalling set of scorecards they were, I thought Perales won by about 5 points and 2 of the judges gave it to hall 117-111 one of the worst robberies I've ever seen, felt bad for Perales.

 

This is a flash knockdown now?

http://i.minus.com/iBL8fBe0WQDMD.gif