Would This Be The Reaction To The Career Of ATG Joe Louis If He Were Boxing in 2016?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Jan 29, 2015.


  1. Decker

    Decker Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,448
    942
    Jul 7, 2007
    You'd better hope so, and in your fantasies you do.

    Once Wlad gets past the early rounds he beats MT like a drum, just like LL did. Tyson gets stopped by round 10.

    People remember what they want. Even in his prime MT didn't blow away even every C level HW. Prime MT lost to Douglas, who was nothing special.
     
  2. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Purrity, Sanders and Brewster were C level

    Douglas was a B level fighter.
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,421
    241,023
    Nov 23, 2013
    Here's the catch Tyson was A-Level when the B-Level guy stopped him, whereas Wlad was C+ or B- Level when those guys stopped him, Wlad is now a A-Level. So H2H at their best Wlad with his near impenetrable defense does a number on Iron Mike and stops my late.
     
  4. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,328
    Aug 27, 2011
    I think tyson would beat wlad but i wouldn't be suprised if Brewster and sanders were to ko douglas.
     
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,965
    Jul 21, 2012
    What do you know about levels? I'll tell you- Nothing

    A level is the best there is. Wlad is not or was ever A level.

    When was he A level? When he showed the world he couldn't box against Povetkin?

    Douglas at his very best proved he was better than any version of Wlad.

    Douglas was A level against Tyson.

    Wlad was C level against Povetkin.

    Tyson>>> day & night>>>> Povetkin.

    Wlad was no better against Povetkin than Broner was against Porter.

    Because the two of them are hypejobs who can't box.
     
  6. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,328
    Aug 27, 2011
    Wlad did knock povetkin down more times though.
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    yeah wlads not magically turned a level from c level, mate, in the time he has lost his physical prime.

    that's reversed klitturd logic, the near opposite of the truth, wlads really gone from B to B-. Hes still fairly good.
     
  8. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,965
    Jul 21, 2012
    Once. Unless you count MMA take downs as legit KDs

    Douglas knocked Tyson out
     
  9. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,328
    Aug 27, 2011
    Yeh I know. But I'm not comparing wlad to broner. Broner is really ****, wlad is a good champ.
     
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,965
    Jul 21, 2012
    Broner fought exactly like Wlad against Porter.

    Stiff arming, pushing , holding , leaning....

    If Wlad fought all the time in America , he'd have been exposed like Broner and certainly knocked out vs Povetkin.
     
  11. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,328
    Aug 27, 2011
    Wlad won the fight because povetkin landed next to **** all.
    Porter won because he outlanded broner 3:1

    That's the difference. Broner was absolute ****e apart from the left hook. Atleast klitchko cheating or not nullified povetkin completely. Now we all know wlad is an octopus but he does stop his opponent from landing and he has a stiff jab.

    But he won't stop fury from landing on his chin...
     
  12. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,421
    241,023
    Nov 23, 2013
    I know a hell of a lot more than you, you still seem to think Wlad is at the same level he was when he fought Purrity, Sanders and Brewster. And for that very reason every argument you make against Wlad is invalid because you're soooo biased against him that it clouds your judgment entirely. Get some help dino you really need it, even I don't go on about Cotto like you do, and I can't stand him.

    And yes Wlad was better he dropped him 4 times like lep said and nailed Povetkin with very sharp and accurate counters the whole night while Sasha flailed like a re**** and did nothing, Wlad won every round with ease, Broner did nothing but hold while Porter pounded away on him winning virtually every round. You're a huge crackpot.
     
  13. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,965
    Jul 21, 2012
    He won because he cheated and fouled 10x worse than Broner did while having a massive size advantage that Broner didn't and having a ref that let him constantly get away with it.

    What Wlad did against Povetkin was worse that what Broner did vs Porter.
    If that fight took place on US soil- wlad would have been DQ' 3 or 4 times over.
     
  14. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,169
    15,962
    Jul 25, 2014
    have to agree with dino here, what wlad did to povetkin was 1000x worse than what broner did to porter. what broner did was try to implement the brook gameplan, but he simply wasn't strong enough. it's funny how the brit****s go ape **** about broner holding but not a peep about the record of 2014 for most holds that brook holds.
     
  15. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,263
    23,965
    Jul 21, 2012
    Peter fight - the Povetkin debacle. He's never been A level. Same Wlad over and over.