Would Trout and Canelo had gone life and death with a slow punching bag like Angulo??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Jun 12, 2013.


  1. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    And Canelo has never lost to any fighter, so what's your point?

    also, you think williams can make it the full 12 with his leaky defense? I think Canelo would knock him out.
     
  2. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    :smoke
     
  3. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,050
    5
    Feb 20, 2011
    Trout might have been knocked out. In fact I believe he would've been.
     
  4. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Yeah Angulo would've knocked any fighter not name Lara that night.:lol:
     
  5. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    that's a big reason why. Of Lara is also just a very skilled fighter as well and had a good blueprint set down by Sergio

    Lara hits pretty hard himself too and couldn't get Williams out of there. Canelo hits harder than him most likely, but he'd struggle to beat Williams more than Lara did.
    A prime Paul Williams beats Canelo for sure, but the version that Lara fought isn't as sure of a bet, but he'd still give Canelo a hell of a lot of trouble.

    If you think Canelo got tired fighting Trout, imagine him fighting Paul
     
  6. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    So he's biggest win till now is not only against a fighter who was tailor made for him but was also already whooped twice and KTFO??
     
  7. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    well it's up there with Angulo and Vanes(he was robbed).
     
  8. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    YDKSAB

    They both would have beaten the old Angulo. Angulo + Hill?

    Trout would have lost.

    Alvarez may have had the power to keep him off of him, but probably would have gassed and lost as well.

    Angulo + Hill are a deadly combination.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Because he hasn't fought anyone other than blow up dolls. :yep
     
  10. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Um no. Angulo seems to have used good footwork and strategy. Lara fell from exhaustion. That is why he worked well after each KD. Lara will beat the brakes off of Trout and Canelo. Angulo from that night probably would have as well. I am sure that Angulo would decimate feather fisted Trout.

    If Alvarez and Trout are so damned good, why haven't they been through the meat grinder (Smith, Molina, Lara, Martirosyan, etc...) and earned their top spots? Saul is getting battered by Matt Hatton. Trout's best win at weight is Delvin Rodriquez. Wake up.
     
  11. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    i stand by what i wrote, and im not the type to try and spin **** around when things dont go like i thought they would. same people making angulo out to be a beast now were saying trout would school canelo and now trout gets schooled by angulo. it would all be funny if these werent grown ass men who cant stand by anything they say and just change **** around to protect their fragile egos. trout and canelo both will beat lara and angulo, and i wont make excuses or create make believe monsters if things dont turn out that way.
     
  12. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Trout beats Cotto but loses to this poor version of Angulo??:rofl your a waste of time so I won't even bother clown.:hi:
     
  13. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Angulo's underrated. He's not just a slow punching bag, he's a high volume puncher with good combinations who can cut off the ring well. Either one would have had their hands full.
     
  14. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    I know you stand by it because YDKSAB. On some silly level you can't see that the difference in Angulo was the footwork and pacing of punching. Angulo was always tough and strong. He had no idea how to deploy that strength. He plodded after guys. Guys who were far less skilled than Lara.

    Trout lost a close fight to Canelo considering he hit that dude a million and one times with jabs. You think those same jabs would have stopped Angulo coming forward? Trout wouldn't have caused ANY of the damage Trout did. You think Trout has the same footwork as Lara? Right.

    Also, you think that Alvarez would have been able to keep moving and/or throw enough crosses to slow, stop, or break Angulo's face before gassing? The same Alvarez who was taking 2 minutes off a round against feather fisted Trout? Right.

    Lara is that good. Angulo's footwork and gameplan that fight were that good. Pretend if you want. Trout and Alvarez are about to be thrown into the belly of the beast due to their losses. I hope you don't have an ego problem when you and those fighters get exposed. Not "if"... When.
     
  15. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    So Cotto is a major player at 154? Who, other than Margarito, do you see him beating of the war horses? Molina? Lara? Smith? Rosado? Right. It is just you holding up a name.

    So you think Cotto would have been able to hold off this attack? Cotto would have been STOPPED not decisioned.

    I know you won't bother. The only thing your dumbass can come up with is Angulo is slow. Fast doesn't equal good footwork. Slow doesn't mean bad footwork. Cotto, Trout, or Canelo would have folded under that attack. You will soon see. :deal