At least your not saying wlad was better than lewis i can pretty much accpet the rest of what you are saying but not in a million years is wlad better than lewis.
Yes, both were mentally weak. Tyson was being headbutted by Holyfield and reacted to it, Im not saying it was right but he did what he had to do.
:smoke Skill wise I think VLAD is actually better but LL has proven to be a warrior and able to pull a fight out of the fire ! VLAD hasnt been proven to be anything but a front runner so far ! but we dont know if he is mentally weak either ! we will have to wait and see and compare at a later date ! Right know LL must be favoured until VLAD makes a case otherwise !:good
Well will have to agree to disagree on this one, I just feel most of the top 10 90s fighters would have a good chance of beating Wlad and that he wouldnt be dominant like he is now.
They were top dudes in 90th..Golota dont last more than 2 rounds with wlad..i can bet on that...his so easy to hit with straights
:good Fair enough ! PS for the record VLAD always dominates his top competion so maybe a prepared VLAD might have fewer losses in the 90s while taking his oponents seriously ! just a thought !
Alot of you seem to forget that steward would be training lewis and not wlad so that goes to his disadvantage, also i don't see what wlad could do to be ever ranked higher than lewis.
how in hell do you know that ( who MANNY would choose ) ? There is nothing anyone can do to make an asolute claim there ( ranking that is ) ! They simply lend people material for opinion based on their perfomences ! How good the opposition was and how the champ wins ! :deal
I know it's vitali it says so at the start, i admit i was trying to pull a fast one but that other guy asked where wlad said lewis was the best, he hasn't but vitali has.
We dont arguing vitaly vs lewis...wlad vs lewis and they are very gentleman people! Also vitaly probaly tought that lewis take his promise for rematch...