Would you approve a Wlad vs Huck fight

So you mean that you can't see the similarites in fighting in spurts. We aren't talking about breaking a cask iron jaw here.

 

IF.....................

Huck made a decent run at HW first.

None of that 1st HW fight back and it's for the title.

Let him beat Gavern, then Boystov, then Mitchell and get his shot that way.:good

 

I'd prefer to see him fight Povetkin and Arreola first...

 

I don't think this fight is a good idea.

 

A Povetkin in terrible shape beat Huck. Who the **** cares about Huck?

Wlad should fight Povetkin, Pulev and Price/Fury next year.

 

And if Haye stood and fought like a man, Wladimir would murder him as well. See, the thing is, Huck isnt prancing around demanding a fight with a Klitschko. He doesnt deserve one. But a low risk fight for 5 million euros? Who wouldnt lap that up. Of course we would rather see Wladimir fight Povetkin, winner of Boystov/Fury, Seth Mitchell or David Price next. It would suck if he choose to take the easier route to big money with the absurd Huck offer. But it would be understandable from a business point of view. At least Huck isn't running around disrespecting the classy, distinguished heavyweight champion of the world. That makes you NOT want to give someone the payday/opportunity to fight you. I am trying to make valid points here, please try to respond with reasonably. Not all that interested in a trolling war (NOT assuming you are, or that I haven't done it in the past):good

 

Not a lot to disagree with here. I will say that Germans really seem to care about Huck, and you have to admit it would be hard for a buisiness man like Beonte to not at least consider squeezing Huck intp the schedule with that rind of risk/reward ratio(5 million Euros for ****ing HUCK?!) I would be content(not necessarily happy) if he fought Povetkin in winter, Huck in summer, and Pulev/Price/Fury or Boystev in the fall. It would be great if he could squeeze a 4th defense in at the end of the year, but that seems unlikely. 3 defenses a year seems to be the max amount of defenses in a year for champions these days. There are a lot of champions who do less, and always have been.

 

Today is further confirmation that Huck is not in Wlad's league and that Huck's good showing against Povetkin might have been a fluke.

Wlad's next opponent should be Povetkin or Pulev.

 

Wlad should hammer Povetkin, then take on Huck in a domestic showdown. After that he can look if Fury wants to fight him -- if he wins against Boytsov.

 

The number 1 cw who was robbed against the number 3 hw.

Of course it's a worthy fight.

 

Huck would be highly motivated for a fight with Wlad & would give a better account of himself than most of Wlad's recent opponents. You can be certain Huck would give it 100% & then probably go out on his shield.

I dont think Povetkin-Huck was a robbery, just a very close fight that couldve gone either way.

 

I'd rather see him fight Pulev or Povetkin but otherwise yes I wouldn't mind seeing this fight.

The number 1 cruiserweight v the number 1 heavyweight.

 

Before the Arslan fight, I would have said a top 5-6 option for Wladimir. After, still a top 10 but not even the tiniest bit sexy (even if it were beforehand).

 

As Wladimir Klitschko is 35 and is running out of fights in his career, I would rather he not waste it on Huck, but rather many of the upcoming younger heavyweights: Pulev, Helenius, Price, Fury, Abdusalamov, Solis, Mitchell, Wilder, Glazkov, Perez, etc. I don't know who among those is going to be a champion one day. But I highly doubt Marco Huck is going to be. Let him fight his way into contention.

 

Whos he fought since haye? Is it just Thompson coz he was top ten ranked plus a mandatory.

wach is a **** fight though.