Would you be happy paying for either of these PPV cards in 2013?

Yeah but it ain't funny to me. I know it ain't feasible in reality these days but back when it was there was no better way to build genuine fan bases and enhance the popularity of the sport.

PPV does absolutely sod all but rob the potential fan of opportunity because they simply won't pay for it and that is to the detriment of the sport.

 

I wasnt LOL'ing at that, i was laughing at the bluntness of this "yes well you do sound a ****", pretty refreshing to hear somebody as forward and aggressive as i can be around here!

And i genuinely couldnt give a **** about PPV or terrestrial TV i have a good job so im minted :good

 

No way..... The undercards aren't just strong enough!

 

the only thing PPV does it put money in the promoters/ fighters pockets. But if they were going to the PPV route then it should be solely the biggest fights like Brook v Khan for a world title, possibly be Froch v Kessler, but if Froch v Ward was on regular then don't see why that should be a Boxoffice.

 

The Froch card for sure, maybe the Brook card too, would be one I'd decide on buying a couple of days before the fight

 

Id pay but would not be happy about it. Id rather not go back to some sky cards being ppv and some on sky sports. Id rather just have it one way or the other. If it were a vote Id vote no.