Would you classify Tony Tucker as an underachiever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Aug 7, 2024.


  1. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 LONG LIVE WASHINGTON Full Member

    17,770
    19,770
    Sep 22, 2021
    My bad I thought McCall held the lineal belt at one point.
     
  2. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,801
    2,029
    Jun 14, 2008
    We have no idea what might've happened if Tucker had not entered the ring against Tyson with a broken right hand. It's like speculating on how Liston-Machen could have been different if Eddie's injured right had not been rendered useless by training injury as an offensive weapon (the same right Machen decked big Nino Valdez with through a single body shot).

    Still, Buster Douglas had all the best of it until TNT's abrupt stoppage win.


    Yeah, Tony's very clearly an underachiever, who really let his body and conditioning completely go by the end. He wasn't the revered Mike Weaver, making the absolute most of what abilities he had. What was his best dominant win? It's a sparse resume.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,582
    23,993
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yeah I think Tony Tucker was probably an underachiever. He actually showed he had good boxing skills to go along with his physical tools. He just wasn’t much of a risk taker in the ring and he was also kept away from quality opposition for too long. That and his lifestyle choices may have hindered his potential. With that said, how far could he have gone ? I honestly have no clue. You can only give so many points for potential without actually seeing it happen. Especially in this game.
     
    Titan1, Greg Price99 and Overhand94 like this.
  4. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,528
    15,187
    Jul 2, 2006
    i don't buy it at all. I think this was an excuse Tucker made. If he was serious, he could have chased a rematch.
     
    Anubis likes this.
  5. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,801
    2,029
    Jun 14, 2008
    It's been decades, so I'd have to review his use of his right hand with Tyson, or lack thereof.

    Eddie Machen, interestingly, did NOT use it as an excuse for losing to Liston. Boxing orthodoxy holds that the right is used for NOT LESS than 80% defense, and he was using his own upheld right to stymie Sonny's hook. Sometimes, Joey Archer went entire bouts without punching once with his right, and he had a good one, even decking SRR with it in Robby's final bout (which was actually a good fight - Archer believes that was only the second career knockdown he ever scored, though the notoriously and comically unreliable BoxWRECK credits him with two count out wins early in his career).
     
    dmt likes this.
  6. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,672
    2,546
    Oct 18, 2004
    Probably so. I think a lot of Tony's problems started early in his career, when he got injured around the time of Leonard-Hearns l and missed around 7 months, then had that knee problem with after Danny Sutton. Took a lot of developing time away from him.
     
  7. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,943
    14,788
    Jun 9, 2007